The fed gov’t shields Pfizer from liability. Gives it billions of dollars. Makes Americans take its product. But won’t let you see the data supporting its safety/efficacy. Who does the gov’t work for?
The FDA has asked a federal judge to make the public wait until the year 2076 to disclose all of the data and information it relied upon to license Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine. That is not a typo. It wants 55 years to produce this information to the public.
As explained in a prior article, the FDA repeatedly promised “full transparency” with regard to Covid-19 vaccines, including reaffirming “the FDA’s commitment to transparency” when licensing Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine.
With that promise in mind, in August and immediately following approval of the vaccine, more than 30 academics, professors, and scientists from this country’s most prestigious universities requested the data and information submitted to the FDA by Pfizer to license its COVID-19 vaccine.
The FDA’s response? It produced nothing. So, in September, my firm filed a lawsuit against the FDA on behalf of this group to demand this information. To date, almost three months after it licensed Pfizer’s vaccine, the FDA still has not released a single page. Not one.
Instead, two days ago, the FDA asked a federal judge to give it until 2076 to fully produce this information. The FDA asked the judge to let it produce the 329,000+ pages of documents Pfizer provided to the FDA to license its vaccine at the rate of 500 pages per month, which means its production would not be completed earlier than 2076. The FDA’s promise of transparency is, to put it mildly, a pile of illusions.
It took the FDA precisely 108 days from when Pfizer started producing the records for licensure (on May 7, 2021) to when the FDA licensed the Pfizer vaccine (on August 23, 2021). Taking the FDA at its word, it conducted an intense, robust, thorough, and complete review and analysis of those documents in order to assure that the Pfizer vaccine was safe and effective for licensure. While it can conduct that intense review of Pfizer’s documents in 108 days, it now asks for over 20,000 days to make these documents available to the public.
So, let’s get this straight. The federal government shields Pfizer from liability. Gives it billions of dollars. Makes Americans take its product. But won’t let you see the data supporting its product’s safety and efficacy. Who does the government work for?
The lesson yet again is that civil and individual rights should never be contingent upon a medical procedure. Everyone who wants to get vaccinated and boosted should be free to do so. But nobody should be coerced by the government to partake in any medical procedure. Certainly not one where the government wants to hide the full information relied upon for its licensure until the year 2076!
By: Jazzhands McFeels
On September 17, the Food and Drug Administration’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee held a hearing to discuss whether or not to authorize a “booster” dose of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine.
The hearing, which can be viewed here, featured testimony and research from several experts that confirmed the suspicions of many observers: not only are Pfizer’s vaccines are ineffective at preventing COVID-19, they are killing more people than they are saving.
Myocarditis in young men
Reports of post-vaccination myocarditis are commonplace on VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System), as well as pro-vaccination internet forums (including hundreds of reports on Reddit’s pro-vax /r/CovidVaccinated subreddit).
After multiple attempts to downplay or dismiss the link between the vaccine and myocarditis, the system has finally admitted that there is, indeed, a link.
According to the September 17th hearing, 1 in 317 boys ages 16-17 will develop myocarditis as a result of the vaccine.
If the booster is approved, this number is projected to increase to 1 in 25.
According to the Mayo Clinic, symptoms of myocarditis include blood clots in the heart, chest pain, shortness of breath (at rest and during physical activity), general fatigue, headache, body aches, and other flu-like symptoms.
In effect, young men that get the vaccine will have the heart of a 60-year-old man at age 16.
Excess death ratio “UNACCEPTABLE”
The FDA presentation also included information showing vaccinated individuals had four times as many heart attacks during a six-month observation period after receiving the Pfizer vaccine.
Vaccine supporters have long derided VAERS as anecdotal, unscientific evidence. However, it appears as if VAERS is actually underreporting adverse vaccine reactions. A statistical analysis of the data from Pfizer’s 6-month study, contained in the FDA presentation, showed that to prevent a single COVID death, five “excess deaths” are required.
Pfizer’s Rigged Phase 3 Trial
When requesting FDA approval for third-round booster shots, Pfizer submitted a study to the FDA that studied only 329 partipants.
The study lasted less than three months, only twelve patients 65 and older (supposedly the priority group), and zero participants age 16 or 17.
Additionally, the study featured “no randomized placebo control group,” found “no clinical effect of booster described” on infections or hospitalizations,” and third-dose booster efficacy to be as low as 40%.
91 Times Deadlier Than Flu Vaccine
Adverse reactions occur, but are uncommon, with seasonal flu vaccines. Evidence presented to the FDA panel found the COVID vaccine causes 91 times more deaths, 28 times more serious adverse effects, 276 times as much coagulopathy, and 126 times as many myocardial infarctions than seasonal flu vaccines.
Anecdotal reports of menstrual disorders, like myocarditis, have been common following COVID vaccination. The FDA presentation corroborates this research, finding “potential links between COVID-19 vaccination and menstrual changes,” and that “some women have reported experiencing irregular or missing menstrual periods, bleeding that is heavier than usual, and other menstrual changes after receiving COVID-19 vaccines.”
According to VAERS reports, there have been 7037 reports of menstrual symptoms across 4783 unique reports. All other vaccines, all years: 897 symptoms in 798 unique reports.
Ivarmectin & alternatives actually work
Alternative non-vaccine treatments have been found to prevent the emergence of serious COVID symptoms, including Hydroxychloroquine (42% reduction in infection duration) and Ivarmectin (56% reduction in residual infection).
Boosters are dangerous and don’t boost immunity
Data from Israel, the first country to implement a third-dose booster shot program, has demonstrated the booster’s lack of efficacy. The rollout of the booster shot coincided with COVID case counts five times larger than the same period in 2020, before any vaccines were available.
Additionally, the rollout of the third dose has tracked closely with an increase in deaths per million.
Finally, data from Israel’s Ministry of Health has shown that vaccine immunity drops over time. At six months post-vaccination, cases per 1000 are over twice as common as cases in people two months post-vaccine. Additionally, just a 12-point decline in efficacy could translate to a five-fold increase in severe case among the vaccinated. In other words, the COVID vaccines do not provide immunity against viral mutations (variants).
…is settled. Not only do the vaccines provide no meaningful protection from COVID-19, but Pfizer’s vaccine is also killing five people for every one person it saves. Young men are particularly at risk from adverse vaccine effects, with 1 in 317 boys getting myocarditis after taking it.
The system is currently pushing to force young children to be vaccinated (and insists that it’s totally different). But in doing so, it’s running up against its own demigod- The Science™.