This video was released in late 2015. Alot of people are all hellbent on the “Great Reset” – yeah, it’s a thing, on this platform many of us pointed this thing out late 2020.
Let me be clear: the transhumanism/bug eating/surveillance apparatus/digital cash/smart city pods/zero-carbon/social credit/vaccine/censorship/equity horseshit/etc is real. That’s out in the open.
Fundamentally at the heart of the Great Reset is that the World Economic Forum struck a deal with the United Nations – the public-private partnership arrangements. This contractual arrangement was made in June 2019, a year before the Great Reset was launched to the public. The true injustice of the arrangement is that the PPP gave multinational corporate conglomerates similar clout, away and power within the UN framework that sovereign nations have. That’s the real threat. BlackRock, Pfizer, Lockheed Martin, Google, etc – have a seat at the table with the US, China, Russia, Brazil, France, etc.
The Great Reset is the normalization of the Great Replacement.
Take a look at this video. This video propelled my “radicalization” aka concern for the future of the West (like, normal people think about things, not globohomo tagging us as “Radicals”
This article covers the United Nations’ political and legal groundwork that facilitates their Replacement Migration agenda, including the legally-binding UN refugee convention and the UN’s various statements on race, discrimination, prejudice, and tolerance. Replacement Migration article coming soon (maybe 2022).
All sources will be listed in section 4.
Criminalizing homogeneity: TL;DR summary
US military marches kids into desegregated schools at bayonet and gunpoint:
Since its founding, one of the primary objectives of the United Nations has been to criminalize nationalism and outlaw racially and ethnically homogeneous countries — specifically White countries. This has been achieved incredibly successfully in the Western world and somewhat successfully in Russia and other Eastern European countries. The United Nations has played a leading but underappreciated (and underpublicized) role in the “diversification” of the West and the ethnic cleansing of Europeans worldwide.
Many here are well aware our government aided by Globohomogayplex Surveillance wants to crush us.
Equipped with this system – it will crush us if it must. This system hates us. That is the absolute reality. To the system, if you call into question the guidance they provide on the pandemic – without any semblance whatsoever of political leanings – it does not matter, you are done for, finished: They have successfully meme’d together their enemies and threats into one group and you are a dissident = a conspiracy theorist = America First = anti-vaxxer = anti-semite = White supremacist = domestic terrorist = conservative = Trump/MAGA-head = nationalist = Oathkeeper = Proud Boy = militiaman = Q = fascist = enemy. You are the enemy and you are a threat to the power structure and you are a target. The last few weeks in media coverage show this to be true:
Larry Elder, African-American candidate for California governor = White supremacist (he’s a Republican)
Nicki Minaj, musician = anti-vaxxer, threat to sacred democracy journalists (for defending her right to ask a question and critique the vaccine effectiveness)
500 people assemble to protest the detention of those in custody for January 6 = every label up there (even worse than 9/11)
14,000 arrivals of Haitian migrants arriving in clearly orchestrated fashion in Texas = “climate-change refugees,” (this is the latest iteration)
The planned armament of Australia by Neo-Liberal US-ZOG with nuclear submarines as a deterrent to Chinese assertion over their own waters and economic destiny = peaceful strategy (for military industrial complex weapons manufacturers and their shareholders)
The FDA rules that the vaccine booster is absolutely NOT required (being shot down by agenda-accepting hordes of people trust-the-science, pronoun-affirming NPCs on Twitter as anti-science)
Chris Rock, comedian, fully vaccinated, contracts COVID (at current, media on Twitter are making mention of him testing positive – tactically omitting the fact he had the vaccine)
Self-actualization is very important right now. Recognize your true strengths, embrace and enhance them. The same for weaknesses. Recognize what you are incapable of and determine if you must proceed accordingly to make improvements. Not your 401k and your retirement plans:
What the fuck are you going to do when the lights go out and the water ceases to run?
The system will destroy you. System means the whole thing: government/business/law enforcement. This system is rigged against you. When Bush said the people that flew planes into the buildings hate your way of life he wasn’t lying – only, he did not reveal the true culprits:
The people that flew those planes into the buildings hate you and would be best off destroying you.
You are their competition, counterpart, opponent, a problem, enemy, the enemy of the domestic well-being of all things Globohomo-neoliberal “democracy” – which means you gotta go, the time is now, the Tetragrammaton fiat-debt-death grip wasn’t quite firm enough for them so they’ve made their modifications and now you must be disposed of. This is not an exaggeration.
The owners, or ruling class/oligarchs/elites/globalists/etc – the ones that have power have known for sometime now that their power is fragile in an information age – so the power structure has merged: government authority, those of wealth, elites/globalists/etc, those that own/run the ultra-mega juggernaut operations called corporations (within finance, technology, biomedical, pharma, retail, etc etc), the people that sit in the offices of the think-tanks crafting policy – these forces have merged into one behemoth of fuckery – and they have their military, their law enforcement mechanism and their lies are wielded to you via their Lügenpresse.
You’ve seen the meme that six corporations own 90% of the media – this continues it’s consolidation and – more importantly is that the owners of the controlling interest of shares those six corporations are institutional investors – investment banks and private equity holdings – the very same people that run finance, academia, retail, real estate…they sit on top of the Board of Directors/Trustees of energy, private equity and the NGOS and state agencies.
These system pigs will destroy us all. The time is now to acknowledge our true enemy must be DESTROYED FIRST.
Bloodlines are real. Lineage is real. Ancestry is real. These have such intrinsic power that it is that if you are an ordinary working class man or woman and you are White, you provide for your family, you enjoy your freedoms as bestowed upon you by the Constitution and Bill of Rights -act as if these freedoms no longer exist.
The techno-corporate-state has has made it policy that if you dare explore the essence of your identity; your ethos and how critical these are to belonging and togetherness within a high trust society than you are perpetrating a hate crime, you will be crushed, you will be charged, you will be blacklisted from society and you will have no redemption.
The virus has a survival rate of 99%. In a vacuum, people would become exposed to the virus and develop an immunity to it. That’s what the immune system does. The world-over inevitably gets exposed and the virus runs it’s course and we move forward. This is how humans have survived nature since the beginning.
This wasn’t about a virus, it wasn’t about safety and it should as fucking hell was never about the well-being of any of us.
The pandemic ignited long in-store plans of orchestrated chaos (and the appearance of chaos) with the absolute ultimate intention of establishment of a one world system of control.
Communism attracts the politically unengaged with the phrase “workers of the world unite”. This draws people in.
Capitalism calls for open markets and free competition.
We are in the age of Communitarianism. The stakeholder Capitalism. Great Reset. New World Order.
To perceive refugees as a dissociated part of the wider narrative is a violation in itself, but who will hold the bloc politically accountable for delegating distasteful tasks to the Libyan coastguard?
In mid-July, Italy’s Chamber of Deputies approved renewing funding to the Libyan coastguard, despite non-governmental organisations urging the authorities to stop financing the failed state’s human trafficking network. Only a day earlier, Amnesty International released a report detailing the trafficking and violations occurring across Libya’s detention centres. European countries have downplayed the documented atrocities against migrants in Libya, preferring to focus on keeping the statistics down.
This week, a boat capsized just off Libya’s coast, with 57 African migrants now presumed dead, among them 20 women and two children. The International Organisation for Migration in Libya (IOM) recently established that almost 6,000 migrants were intercepted and returned to Libya this year so far. Migrants known to have perished in the Mediterranean this year number 970.
International interference in Libya since 2011 and the fall of Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi has resulted in a country in which militias compete for territory and power. Vested UN and international interests in the country have exacerbated the humanitarian ramifications.
While the deals which the EU reached with the Libyan coastguard have been deemed controversial by human rights organisations, public sentiment in Europe veers towards pushback. Migration is played as a powerful card across the political spectrum, with both governments and the public fomenting racism and xenophobia. The result is widespread oblivion about the politics which created refugees and failed states.
With governments focused on statistics, reports such as the recent one by Amnesty International exist to inform only those who are already well-informed. Hence the absence of connecting capsized boats to deliberate damage inflicted by the Libyan coastguard to the vessels, resulting in deaths away from Europe’s shores. Neither is the complicity between Libya and European states made evident in terms of the EU financing abuses and torture in Libya’s detention camps. The rift between politics and non-governmental organisations, in the case of migrants, has been reduced to accusations of trafficking, whereas political culpability, which plays a major role in terms of funding the occurring atrocities, is kept out of focus.
In one instance in July this year, the Libyan coastguard was filmed firing at migrants in Malta’s Search and Rescue (SAR) area. The Libyan coastguard also attempted to ram the boat carrying migrants several times.
Researchers have established a link between European arms sales and increased displacement of people. The link between Italy’s funding of the Libyan coastguard and the interception of migrants was also included in the report.
Testimony published in Amnesty International’s report is chilling. “Death in Libya: it’s normal. No one will look for you and no one will find you,” states one quote by a 21 year old male refugee. The oblivion extends beyond Libya. With European governments intent on keeping migrants away from Europe’s shores, the bloc, which is purportedly concerned with human rights, finds it easier to neglect its obligations. No one in Libya would look for a refugee, and no one in Europe would, either, especially since the EU is paying Libya to do its dirty work.
Amnesty International called upon the EU to ensure accountability. However, accountability from within the same paradigm of exploitation will merely create new victims. The EU cheered in 2011 when the NATO coalition intervened in Libya for regime change under the guise of bringing democracy. One bloody consequence of the decision has been the increase in human trafficking of migrants, which the EU sought to quell through militarisation and surveillance, but never through addressing its wrongs. To perceive refugees as a dissociated part of the wider narrative is a violation in itself, but who will hold the bloc politically accountable for delegating distasteful tasks to the Libyan coastguard?
This foundation was created by George Soros. It’s utopian vision involves inverting reality, reason, rationale, common sense and your visceral reaction to the thought of being erased and replaced – invert these notions on their heads….clownworld is now pisseartth indeed…
The Introduction of global warming/climate change meme by the UN in 1992, called Agenda 21. The United Nations described Agenda 21 as follows:
“Agenda 21 is a comprehensive plan of action to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organizations of the United Nations System, Governments, and Major Groups in every area in which human impacts on the environment.
Agenda 21, the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, and the Statement of principles for the Sustainable Management of Forests were adopted by more than 178 Governments at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992.
The Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD) was created in December 1992 to ensure effective follow-up of UNCED, to monitor and report on implementation of the agreements at the local, national, regional and international levels. It was agreed that a five year review of Earth Summit progress would be made in 1997 by the United Nations General Assembly meeting in special session.
The full implementation of Agenda 21, the Programme for Further Implementation of Agenda 21 and the Commitments to the Rio principles, were strongly reaffirmed at the World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) held in Johannesburg, South Africa from 26 August to 4 September 2002.”
The key to Agenda 21 falling short was the lack of the yet to come Big Tech/Big Data/Deep Machine Learning/Artificial Intelligence element that would come in the mid 2010s.
One of the major proponents of Agenda 21 – and one world governance – is the Rockefeller Foundation. As Agenda 21 laid stagnant, the Foundation put this report out in 2010:
One of the most interesting early findings of the plutocracy plan for a takeover comes in the Rockefeller Foundation’s 2010 document titled “Rockefeller Foundation – Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development 2010”
As we can see once we read this document, their future scenario IN THIS DOCUMENT FROM 2010, is brought about by a global pandemic that ushers in a new order. In fact, this future scenario is the catalyst used to bring about “more authoritarian control” which ‘sticks’ and even “intensifies”. (WOW.) Here are the highlights , but link is above if you want to read the whole document. The report titledScenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development has a stated goal of creating “a world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback.” “A world in which highly coordinated and successful strategies emerge for addressing both urgent and entrenched worldwide issues… An economically unstable and shock-prone world in which governments weaken, criminals thrive, and dangerous innovations emerge… An economically depressed world in which individuals and communities develop localized, makeshift solutions to a growing set of problems.” Although the authors of the paper try to claim they are just imagining not predicting the future, given the immense role of the Rockefeller family bloodline and Rockefeller Foundation in pushing the New World Order (NWO) Global Government, this is a ruse to cover their active planning for crisis scenarios that they know will happen. It is also a fine example of predictive programming. In actuality, they are blueprints written by key insiders who already know the game plan and the agenda, and have the power to make it happen. This document expresses 4 scenarios:1) Lock Step — Tighter Top Down Government Control and Growing Citizen Pushback 2) Hack Attack — Unstable Shock Prone World In Which Criminals Thrive 3) Smart Scramble — Economically Depressed World With Make Shift Solution To Ever Growing Problems. 4) Clever Together — A Highly Coordinated Global Government Where Successful Strategies For Solving All Problems Emerges. The scenario “Lock Step”, one of four included in a publication called “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development” in 2010, describes a coronavirus-like pandemic that becomes the trigger for the imposition of police-state controls on movement, economy, and other areas of society. Remove such obstacles as ‘individual rights’ and you have a recipe for surviving, even thriving in the event of a pandemic, the Foundation states. (remember, this was written in 2010): “A few countries did fare better – China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing-off of all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter post-pandemic recovery.” The message is clear – police state good, freedom bad. And other governments rapidly get the message, according to the simulation. First and third world nations alike follow suit by “flexing their authority” and imposing quarantines, body-temperature checks, and other “airtight rules and restrictions” – most of which, the report is careful to note, remain in place even as the pandemic recedes into the past. “In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems – from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty – leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power.” “This global power-grab is facilitated by a frightened citizenry who “willingly gave up some of their sovereignty – and their privacy – to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability…tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight.” “Everything from tighter biometric identification to stricter industrial regulation is welcomed with open arms. It takes over a decade for people to “grow weary” of the authoritarian controls imposed in the wake of the pandemic, and hints that even the civil unrest that ultimately manifests is focused on the developed world. After all, a popular uprising in the technocratic police state envisioned by the simulation would be all but impossible – as it will be in real life once 5G makes real-time total surveillance of all cities a reality.” Just as many scientists concluded SARS was a manmade bioweapon, many scientists, statesmen, and alternative media, have raised the alarm about coronavirus. Good luck finding any of their statements on Google, however. Facebook, Youtube and Twitter have been hard at work removing coronavirus “rumors,” and Google has memory-holed hundreds of search results regarding Chinese accusations of biowarfare. (I am not saying this is or is not true. I just find it interesting that you can not find ANY of this information online anymore. Don’t you find that odd?)
Remember, this document is looking at a future scenario from its publish date of 2010,which was ten years ago. The Rockefeller Foundation paints a disturbing picture, a future pandemic that kills 8 million people in just seven months. (Looking at the present, the Coronavirus has not killed anywhere near that number. Most of those who died from Coronavirus had chronic health issues to begin with.
More in the document: “The pandemic also had a deadly effect on economies: international mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and breaking global supply chains. Even locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers.” More scenarios in the document:“Without Government Intervention Virus Spreads” “The pandemic blanketed the planet—though disproportionate numbers died in Africa, Southeast Asia, and Central America, where the virus spread like wildfire in the absence of official containment protocols.” Translation: In the absence of an authoritarian government, the virus was able to spread. By definition, the Rockefeller Foundation is embracing and promoting authoritarian government. In their scenario, they are seeking to remove the rights of the people in order to prevent the virus from spreading. In their mind, during a Pandemic or other similar event, the government must overturn the law and become authoritarian. That all becomes even more clear as we continue to analyze this document. In developed countries, containment was a challenge. The United States’s initial policy of “strongly discouraging” citizens from flying proved deadly in its leniency, accelerating the spread of the virus not just within the U.S. but across borders. In the mind of the Rockefeller Foundation, our Constitution amounts to “leniency”. Therefore, our Constitution should have been suspended, and replaced with authoritarian government in order to contain the spread of the future virus. This is a clear violation of our basic God-given rights. (remember, this was written in 2010). More from the document: “Authoritarianism Will Contain Virus Outbreak” “However, a few countries did fare better—China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing off of all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter post- pandemic recovery.” The globalist Rockefeller Foundation praises Communist China for their authoritarian actions, remember, this was a future scenario, not reality. However, this is exactly what happened in China! They were indeed the first to lock down their nation, and the rest of the world followed suit. By definition, the Rockefeller Foundation explains Communism, which is authoritarianism protecting the people. Of course, this is always how globalists spin their propaganda, “it’s for the good of the people”. In reality, our freedoms are removed for the good of global government, not for the people. From the 2010 document: “During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets.” (ummmm, sound familiar?) If it is hard for you to differentiate this future scenario from reality, you are not alone. Their future scenario is our reality, just look at what is happening right now. “Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified.” Not only will these authoritarian controls remain according to the Rockefeller Foundation, but they will intensify. That means our freedom and rights will continue to be removed, not just in the United States, but globally. (Have you heard of “The Great Reset” yet? Read my other post linked at the top). “In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems—from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty—leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power.”
As we can see, their future scenario IN THIS DOCUMENT FROM 2010, is brought about by a global pandemic that ushers in a new order. In fact, this future scenario is the catalyst used to bring about “more authoritarian control” which ‘sticks’ and even “intensifies”.
So what is so interesting about this document and who wrote it, is that The Rockefeller Foundation is one of the main funders of the World Economic Forum that is implementing Agenda 2030/Sustainable Development Goals/New World Order. To change the world into Global Governance (New World Order), a world crisis needs to occur to move into “The Great Reset”. Eeeerily similar to this 2010 document written by these same GLOBALISTS funding the UN & Global Governance. This is a simple connect the dots.
Just a snippet of info about the Rockefellers: The Rockefeller family has been in the forefront of eugenics-the science of population control, since 1902. In 1952, David Rockefeller’s eldest brother John established the Population Council. In the subsequent decades, the eugenics program developed, tested, and implemented various bio-warfare tools, as a means of controlling population growth. Since then, efforts at creating the necessary infrastructure, research bodies, lab testing and experimentations, have proceeded till the present day. By the end of 1945, the dominant force in America was the 5 Rockefeller brothers. Their mandate was to take control of the entire globe, and to eliminate any rivals on its quest for global dominance.
“This Agenda is a plan of action for people, planet and prosperity. It also seeks to strengthen universal peace in larger freedom. We recognise that eradicating poverty in all its forms and dimensions, including extreme poverty, is the greatest global challenge and an indispensable requirement for sustainable development. All countries and all stakeholders, acting in collaborative partnership, will implement this plan. We are resolved to free the human race from the tyranny of poverty and want and to heal and secure our planet. We are determined to take the bold and transformative steps which are urgently needed to shift the world onto a sustainable and resilient path. As we embark on this collective journey, we pledge that no one will be left behind. The 17 Sustainable Development Goals and 169 targets which we are announcing today demonstrate the scale and ambition of this new universal Agenda. They seek to build on the Millennium Development Goals and complete what these did not achieve. They seek to realize the human rights of all and to achieve gender equality and the empowerment of all women and girls. They are integrated and indivisible and balance the three dimensions of sustainable development: the economic, social and environmental.”
Take a good look at the symbols for Agenda 2030 as they now appear EVERYWHERE:
In detail, the SDGs are explained here:
Sustainable Development Goals
Goal 1. End poverty in all its forms everywhere
Goal 2. End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture
Goal 3. Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages
Goal 4. Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all
Goal 5. Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls
Goal 6. Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all
Goal 7. Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all
Goal 8. Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all
Goal 9. Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation
Goal 10. Reduce inequality within and among countries
Goal 11. Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable
Goal 12. Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns
Goal 13. Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts*
Goal 14. Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development
Goal 15. Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss
Goal 16. Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels
Goal 17. Strengthen the means of implementation and revitalize the global partnership for sustainable development
THE INITIATION OF AGENDA 2030:
Key development in June 2019 – PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN UN AND WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM:
The United Nations entered into a strategic partnership with the World Economic Forum (WEF) in June 2019. Their partnership was formulated to carrying out Agenda 2030 over the course of a decade. A summary of their partnership reads as follows:
“Meeting the Sustainable Development Goals is essential for the future of humanity. The World Economic Forum is committed to supporting this effort, and working with the United Nations to build a more prosperous and equitable future,”
Klaus Schwab, World Economic Founder & Executive Chairman.
“The new Strategic Partnership Framework between the United Nations and the World Economic Forum has great potential to advance our efforts on key global challenges and opportunities, from climate change, health and education to gender equality, digital cooperation and financing for sustainable development. Rooted in UN norms and values, the Framework underscores the invaluable role of the private sector in this work – and points the way toward action to generate shared prosperity on a healthy planet while leaving no one behind,”
António Guterres, UN Secretary General.
The Gates FoundatiON:
Bill Gates face is everywhere lately. He seems to be the mouthpiece of the collective globalist agenda, spearheading the vaccine initiative, as well as making commentary on climate change, Bitcoin and smart cities – amongst other things.
Bill and Melinda Gates started the Gates Foundation and as far back as February 2000, pledged $750 Million to a Global Fund to the benefit of the UN, UN-linked World Health Organization and UNICEF – with funds earmarked for vaccines. The announcement of the donation was made at a WEF event:
John Hopkins University:
Bill Gates and the Gates Foundation have made nearly $100 Million in donations to various initiatives to John Hopkins University, beginning in 1997. The university is one of the oldest most prestigious medical schools in the world. A summary of these charitable contributions can be viewed here: Gates Foundation and John Hopkins University
From the John Hopkins University-Bloomberg School of Public Health came the think-tank the Center for Health Security.
October 2019, the John Hopkins Center for Health Security, under the guidance of the Gates Foundation and the World Economic Forum, hosted Event 201. On the Center for Health Security website, Events 201 is described as follows:
“The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation hosted Event 201, a high-level pandemic exercise on October 18, 2019, in New York, NY. The exercise illustrated areas where public/private partnerships will be necessary during the response to a severe pandemic in order to diminish large-scale economic and societal consequences.
“in recent years, the world has seen a growing number of epidemic events, amounting to approximately 200 events annually. These events are increasing, and they are disruptive to health, economies, and society. Managing these events already strains global capacity, even absent a pandemic threat. Experts agree that it is only a matter of time before one of these epidemics becomes global—a pandemic with potentially catastrophic consequences. A severe pandemic, which becomes “Event 201,” would require reliable cooperation among several industries, national governments, and key international institutions.”
-Center for Health Security, 2019
Bill Gates, the founder of Microsoft. Microsoft made an investment in Facebook in 2007, years prior to Facebook’s IPO. The investment was $240 Million. At the time, Dustin Moscovitz was still materially involved at the executive levels of Facebook.
Event 201 was supported by funding from the Open Philanthropy Project, a not-for-profit foundation chaired by one of Facebook’s founders and owners, Dustin Moscovitz.
The Open Philanthropy Project recommended a grant of $16 million over three years to the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security (CHS) to provide general operating support, to support its domestic and international work on health security and public health preparedness, and to fund an initiative focused on potential global catastrophic risks (GCRs) posed by pandemic pathogens.
THE PANDEMIC BEGINS – DECEMBER 2019:
Taking a lookback at the Rockefeller document, the entire benefit of the pandemic would be economic, social and academic lockdowns around the world:
THE DECIMATION OF THE MIDDLE CLASS:
We all know of the endless microcosms as to the effect the lockdowns have had in terms of eviscerating the workling class. What I found fascinating are these two articles, published a day apart, in the same publication, Business Insider:
$3.7 vs $3.9 trillion – WEALTH TRANSFER IN PLAIN SIGHT. THIS IS WHAT THE ENTIRE PURPOSE OF THE LOCKDOWNS OF SMALL AND MIDSIZE BUSINESSES DURING SCAMDEMIC HAS BEEN.
It runs much deeper. The underbelly of the Great Reset is a shift from the past 100+/- years of a fiat currency based global system of debt-laden, consumerist capitalism – which I firmly believe that in the past three decades of the internet and world wide web made open to the common public – this information age has exposed that the “rulers of the world” are the globalist/elitist/ZIONIST money changing families that have pilfered all the natural, needed and precious resources from the people in exchange of this worthless debt-based system of credit which uses currency – fiat – which has no intrinsic value. The system was coming down in 1986, again in 2001, heavy exposure in the 2008 “crisis” and the blackhole of FOREVER-DEBT is all a huge SCAM.
Therefore – with Agenda 2030, which is being spearheaded into place by the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset – a new paradigm of VALUE is being manufactured by the UN’s many programs, the IMF, the Bank of International Settlements, the mega-investment firms (BlackRock, JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs), the critical global consulting firms (McKinsey, Accenture, Deloitte, KPMG, E&Y, PriceWaterhouseCoopers, etc), the powerful think tanks (Brookings Institution, the Chatham House, Council on Foreign Relations) and on and on….this new measure of value will be determined by a yet to be finalized set of SUSTAINABILITY ACCOUNTING STANDARDS. However, provided are the UNITED NATION’S ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMME FINANCE INITITATIVE’s cute little pamphlet on how banks will become signatories for the Sustainable Development Goals.
This would all seem like fluff – only – the sentiment of (((Western Democracies))) is to capitulate to the BIG BAD CLIMATE CHANGE EXTINCTION EVENT which is inevitable unless a ONE WORLD CULTURE emerges that will acquiesce and give in to the climate change atomwaffen blast that is inevitable.
Check out policy papers by corporations, think tanks, NGOs, governments far and wide, etc etc
Deloitte with the WEF:
CHINA will lead the way:
RESCUE NGO MEME’S REFUGEES WITH CLIMATE CHANGE:
Petronas – gayOped
McKinsey (STATING PANDEMIC WILL LAST 18 MONTHS:
The Economist (Rothschild Consortium publication)
I have found over one thousand documents all regurgitating the same shit. Over the span of two decades.
This is a collection of recent videos on YouTube that aid the Great Reset – sustainability/equity/climate action/change/lgbtq/racism/net zero/carbon emissions/stakeholder equity/migration – all these words are just interchangeable. Like “Climate Equity Has Gay”….let’s look at the meme’ing:
GLAAD – Intersection of the Climate Justice and LGBTQ Movements
GLAAD 20 Under 20 Honoree and youth climate activist Jamie Margolin discusses the impact of climate change on LGBTQ communties and how the media plays an important role in transforming the public’s understanding of the climate crisis.
Disposition: GLAAD actually openly states on their website that they: GLAAD rewrites the script for LGBTQ acceptance. As a dynamic media force, GLAAD tackles tough issues to shape the narrative and provokedialogue that leads to cultural change. In other words, whatever we say about anything and everything is what we do because we are the gays that were trained by some shrewd Jews to structure our organization as a not-for-profit which generates income from donors that receive a tax liability alleviation for donating to us. Donors need tax breaks, we need to get paid a to lie, or else this operation would not sustain. So it is good that you listen to our narrative crafting because we are the gays that are brave enough to traverse the world of HIV/AIDS thru using Prep to hopefully avoid catching the virus…yet we are scared beyond description of the bat-flu. We stick our dick up the asses of AIDS-laden men but we wear a mask while doing so. Therefore, we have the moral high ground. We are the big gay disco.
Vice News: Openly Leftist Media Platform: The Climate Migrant
Audelio Mejía’s family has grown corn in the agricultural heart of Central America, known as the Golden Triangle, for three generations. But for the last year, the 50-year-old smallholder farmer has seriously considered migrating north with the help of a coyote. He’s not afraid of gang violence or political persecution, like many migrants who would claim asylum in the U.S. He’s worried about rain — and the lack of it.
Disposition: Vice continues streak of creativity.
Columbia University: Climate Change-Induced Migration
The impacts of climate change (including climate variability and extremes) on human mobility has become an area of increasing interdisciplinary research focus. While linkages are complex and context-specific, there is evidence to suggest that climate factors can and do play a role in migration decision making – though they generally operate indirectly through more direct economic, demographic, social, and political drivers. A variety of research has been undertaken at the Earth Institute. This panel is an opportunity for the scientists involved to summarize key results that shed light on causal mechanisms, migration patterns, future projections, and more. Portions of the program focus on West Africa owing to two projects, a recently completed World Bank-funded project on modeling climate change-induced migration in West Africa, and a newly funded NSF project entitled “Disentangling climate, food security and social factors as drivers of migration in and out of West Africa.” — SPS advances knowledge with purpose to move careers, communities, and markets forward. Our mission is to provide a rigorous education, informed by rapidly evolving global market needs, that supports the academic and professional aspirations of our student community. Our vision is to become the premier destination for professional education by generating interdisciplinary thought leadership, developing innovative pedagogy, and advancing globally competitive academic solutions for ambitious agents of change and impact.
Disposition: They are ambitious agents of change and impact.…aka ambitious liars.
Stockholm Environment Institute – International migration and the impact on climate change
Mistra Geopolitics and Stockholm Climate Security Hub invite you to a seminar on international migration and the impact on climate change with Rainer Münz – Special Adviser on Migration and Demography, European Strategy Policy Centre (ESPC), European Commission, Brussels.
Disposition: the Swedes have been subjected to the climate change. Mudslides. Years of them now.
Racism and Climate Change Are About You | Dr. Atyia Martin | TEDxDirigo
Climate change effects us all, but it doesn’t effect us equally. In this thorough talk, Dr. Martin examines the intersections of climate change and racism, from who’s at the table during policymaking, to which communities are effected by natural disasters, and which receive resources first. Incorporating multidisciplinary data and research, Dr. Martin proposes ways for us to scrutinize bias in ourselves, our workplaces, and our social groups. Dr. Atyia Martin is a Certified Emergency Manager with a diverse set of experiences in public health, emergency management, intelligence, and homeland security. Mayor Martin Walsh appointed her as the Chief Resilience Officer for the City of Boston as part of the 100 Resilient Cities initiative pioneered by the Rockefeller Foundation. In this role, she is responsible for leading the development and implementation of Boston’s Resilience Strategy. Boston will focus on advancing racial equity as the foundation of the Resilience Strategy process. Dr. Martin has served as adjunct faculty in the Master of Homeland Security at Northeastern University. She was previously the Director of the Office of Public Health Preparedness at the Boston Public Health Commission. Her previous professional experience includes the Boston Police Department’s Boston Regional Intelligence Center; City of Boston’s Mayor’s Office of Emergency Management; the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI); and active duty Air Force assigned to the National Security Agency. This talk was given at a TEDx event using the TED conference format but independently organized by a local community. Learn more at https://www.ted.com/tedx
Disposition: this large afro doesn’t compensate for the fact she is not a medical doctor. But purports to be a doctor. Not an honest broker. More big bullshit. End of discussion.
Fleeing climate change — the real environmental disaster | DW Documentary
How many millions of people will be forced to leave their homes by 2050? This documentary looks at the so-called hotspots of climate change in the Sahel zone, Indonesia and the Russian Tundra. Lake Chad in the Sahel zone has already shrunk by 90 percent since the 1960s due to the increasing heat. About 40 million people will be forced to migrate to places where there is enough rainfall. Migration has always existed as a strategy to adapt to a changing environment. But the number of those forced to migrate solely because of climate change has increased dramatically since the 1990s. It is a double injustice: after becoming rich at the expense of the rest of the world, the industrialized countries are now polluting the atmosphere with their emissions and bringing a second misfortune to the inhabitants of the poorer regions. One of them is Mohammed Ibrahim: as Lake Chad got hotter and drier, he decided to go where the temperatures were less extreme and there was still a little water, trekking with his wife, children and 70 camels from Niger to Chad and then further south. The journey lasted several years and many members of his herd died of thirst. Now he and his family are living in a refugee camp: they only have seven camels left. Mohammed is one of many who have left their homelands in the Sahel – not because of conflict and crises, but because of the high temperatures. He’s a real climate refugee. _______ DW Documentary gives you knowledge beyond the headlines. Watch high-class documentaries from German broadcasters and international production companies. Meet intriguing people, travel to distant lands, get a look behind the complexities of daily life and build a deeper understanding of current affairs and global events. Subscribe and explore the world around you with DW Documentary.
Disposition: They actually said . It is a double injustice: after becoming rich at the expense of the rest of the world, the industrialized countries are now polluting the atmosphere with their emissions and bringing a second misfortune to the inhabitants of the poorer regions. – this is the meme.
The Years Project – Refugees Are Fleeing Climate Change
Tens of millions of people could be displaced by climate change by the end of this century. Climate scientist Michael Oppenheimer explains why that matters, why he supports the right to migrate, and what governments need to do to prepare. Watch More Climate Facts: https://theyearsproject.com/watch/cli… This story is part of Covering Climate Now, a global collaboration of more than 250 news outlets that aims to strengthen coverage of the climate crisis.
Disposition: Their motto is OUR MISSION: Harness the power of story to compel action on the climate crisis. Translation – Harness the power of making shit up to compel action on an already made up shit. Big piles of shits of lies and bullocks and wank.
National Geographic – Climate Change and the Migrant Crisis | Years of Living Dangerously
Tom Friedman travels from France to Niger, following the trail of migrants and unraveling how climate change is driving people to leave their homes. ➡ Subscribe: http://bit.ly/NatGeoSubscribe ➡ Watch all clips of Years of Living Dangerously here: http://bit.ly/WatchYearsofLivingDange… ➡ Get More Years of Living Dangerously: http://bit.ly/NGYearsofLivingDangerously About Years of Living Dangerously: In this groundbreaking event series, celebrity correspondents bring us stories on those affected by, and seeking solutions to, climate change – from locations shockingly close to home. Covering issues like severe hurricanes, droughts, and the increasing extinction rate of wildlife, it’s a gritty look at not only how we have impacted our planet, but also how we can save it for future generations.
Disposition: Big Jew travels from France to Nigger and fabricates a connection between developed Western nations being responsible for the ineptitudes of people from countries that make cookies out of fecal matter.
Adelphi (Berlin) – Links Between Migration and Climate Change
The connection between migration and climate change has become a priority for climate diplomacy. In view of future climate risks, it is important to analyse how climate change can impact migration pathways and what approaches will help to address climate-induced displacements – both within and between countries. It is clear that one has to allow for the immense complexity of the phenomenon. Interviews with experts from the Planetary Security community: Francesco Femia, Kitty van der Heijden, Hammou Laamrani, Dan Smith, Michel Rademaker and Tom Middendorp.
Disposition: They wrote “It is clear that one has to allow for the immense complexity of the phenomenon” which means “this is complete fucking bullshit but whiteness is at fault”
This is from my faceberg account, which I am surprised they let me make one. My normie faceberg from 2008 onward was zucced for hatespeech for I denounced Elizabeth Warren’s voting record on the pkatform. Hence, criticism of a politician in the digital sphere is hate speech in our Bat-Flu, Neo-Liberal, Debt-Laden, Soulless, Godless, Degenerative, Malfeasant, Dildo Sanitizer nation of PRONOUNciation. The genderfluid-jihadists are winning…
The CFR is the upper echelon of the globalist organizations (as you will see members of the CFR are on the Board of Directors of the World Economic Forum, Morgan Stanley, the CIA, America University, the Carlyle Group, Booz Allen Hamilton Inc., Kissinger Associates, Inc., BlackRock, Warburg Pincus, National Academy of Medicine, McKinsey Global Institute, Alphabet, Princeton University and CNN amongst others. The organization was established in 1921.
The self-ascribed purpose of the CFR is as follows:
“The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, business executives, journalists, educators and students, civic and religious leaders, and other interested citizens in order to help them better understand the world and the foreign policy choices facing the United States and other countries.
Founded in 1921, CFR carries out its mission by maintaining a diverse membership, with special programs to promote interest and develop expertise in the next generation of foreign policy leaders; convening meetings at its headquarters in New York and in Washington, DC, and other cities where senior government officials, members of Congress, global leaders, and prominent thinkers come together with Council members to discuss and debate major international issues; supporting a Studies Program that fosters independent research, enabling CFR scholars to produce articles, reports, and books and hold roundtables that analyze foreign policy issues and make concrete policy recommendations; publishing Foreign Affairs, the preeminent journal on international affairs and U.S. foreign policy; sponsoring Independent Task Forces that produce reports with both findings and policy prescriptions on the most important foreign policy topics; and providing up-to-date information and analysis about world events and American foreign policy on its website, CFR.org.”
Their self-ascribed claim of being “independent” and being “non-partisan are complete bullshit. Have a look at this diagram which shows the depth of the penetration of reach of this organization:
Notes from the Essay:
The authors of the paper state “that along with U.S.-Soviet competition and the Cold War, the COVID-19 pandemic represents the most serious challenge to the U.S.-led international order. They call this “a moment of radical international uncertainty” that “occurs at a troubling time geopolitically, including the withdrawal of the United States from global leadership.”
In other words, they are in lockstep with the language of the Great Reset – just like everyone else.
It is especially noted that Kissinger’s motivation in geopolitical struggles often included the benefit of a future relationship with China:
“During his years in once, Kissinger above all else sought to apply his concept and objectives of world order to the relationship between the United States and the Soviet Union and to prepare for the emergence of China as an eventual world power.”
The End of World Order and American Foreign Policy – Page 6
The two primary authors of the article give an assessment of geopolitical state of affairs since the pandemic began to emanate worldwide:
“the pandemic has undermined order by straining governments, dividing societies, exacerbating societal inequalities, heightening tensions between the United States and China, and demonstrating the vast gap between global problems and the world’s ability to address them through existing international institutions.“
The End of World Order and American Foreign Policy – Forward V
This is also a regurgitation of the language coming out of the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset, as the entire core of the Great Reset is to repurpose geopolitical politics, rework international institutions and – also – in line with the Kalergi Plan – establish a one world culture where the Americans, Soviets (former nations of the USSR) and the Chinese work towards miscegenation and race mixing to lose their own borders, language, cultures, heritage – abandon any/all in-group preferences – to evolve into the “One World Culture” called for by the Rothschild consortium created, Bolshevik inspired, Zionist run United Nations.
The following are some of my favorite fear porn quotes from the release – which basically they are laying the framework for an endemic to run concurrent with the forever wars in Syria, Afganistan, Iraq, Yemen, Libya, and elsewhere:
“This is a moment of radical international uncertainty. Despite many commentaries to the contrary, it is difficult to predict what the long-term impact of the COVID-19 crisis will be on the quest for world order” – which is basically saying “this fucking thing sucks for you but it gives us work to do”
“By contrast, although this crisis occurs at a troubling time geopolitically, including the withdrawal of the United States from global leadership, until the pandemic it was a period of interdependence and prosperity for many countries.”
– this is a reassurance that the last bastion of freedom – the Constitutional rights afforded to Americans will perish as a result of the fall of American global hegemony. Freedom of expression, association, speech and assembly, the right to bear arms in the advent of a tyrannical government, private property ownership, the right to a fair trial, certain educational, religious, medicinal and cultural freedoms – KISSINGER IT ALL GOODBYE ONCE THE LAUNCH OF THE DIGITAL ID IN TANDEM WITH THE DIGITAL CURRENCY ISSUED FROM THE BANK OF INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENTS COMES INTO PLAY.
These following questions are wonderful:
“Will medical shortcomings trigger mass migration?”
...there used to a time when the UN allowed asylum for refugees. Refugees are people that are in mortal danger if they return to their war-torn homelands. However, over the course of the past decade, the United Nations has done a brilliant job of meme’ing a refugee and an economic migrant into the same thing. This statement basically says that “western nations have the moral imperative to take “migrants” from all over the entire planet AND AND it will be their duty to provide proper medical treatment….and it must be free of cost to the migrants or else it is a RASICM (per the ADL).
Will mass digital surveillance become more attractive if it offers an alternative to economic shutdown?
….seriously they write like this? Of course it becomes more attractive to the ones gathering intelligence by mass surveillance. This is just a foreshadowing of the coming Communitarianism.
You know I wanted to do this deep analysis of this CFR bulletin because it was interesting at first but the entire thing is just loud cheer FOR GLOBOHOMO. NEO-LIBERAL, DEBT-LADEN, RACELESS, BORDERLESS, GENDERLESS, CHILDLESS, GODLESS, UBI-FUNDED CONSUMERIST CAPITAL WHERE EVERYTHING IS MEANT TO EXPLODE.
THE CFR IS THE ENEMY, I HAVE FOLLOWED THEM FOR TWENTY YEARS. THEY ARE ZIONIST MOUTHPIECES. THEY ARE ONES THAT SEND OUT THE MEMOS. THE MEMOS OF THE GLOBOHOMOGAYPLEX.