Sacred Destabilization • Part Four: Antinomianism and the Spiritual Roots of Critical Theory Philosophy

By: Eric • August 24, 2022


Drawing:, “Master’s Lodge as ruined Temple,” Les Francs-Maçons Ecrasés, 1747. [the ruined Temple is symbolic of the Second Temple of Solomon, which was destroyed]

Allow us to focus the lights of the arena on this concept for a moment. A certain cluster of churches rooted in Protestant sects of Christianity have carried out the agenda of Diversity, Inclusion and Equity™ by accepting and welcoming the LGBTQ people to the faith. This is de facto revoking the word of the Lord as stated in the bible. This is no longer a sin. If scripture is subject to revocation – than sin itself is subject to eradication.


Norm Macdonald Tweet from 2017(?) – predicting the Church of the Woke? He nailed it!

[Dear reader, uncited, quick summations of the following concepts, eras in time and historical events are given for the purpose of expediency, for they will be touched upon in more detail going forward. This is a 30 part series – the Sacred Destabilization]


Ordo ab Chao

Amongst many faiths, religions and mythologies, there is this ever present theme of “creation through destruction” – or within Freemasonry, the Latin “Ordo ab Chao”, which means “out of chaos, comes order.”

Yet, what, or who, creates the chaos and what defines chaos?

Take a look around. We are in the chaos. This is Building Seven, low-key, the world over. 



Antinomianism

From New World Encyclopedia: “Antinomianism or lawlessness in theology, is the idea that members of a particular religious group are under no obligation to obey the laws of ethics or morality as presented by religious authorities.”

The heart of antinomianism is belief in human perfection, the state of divine indwelling in which anything that one wills is good because it is prompted by the presence of God within.

As we discussed in Part Three, Sabbati Zevi introduced his brand of Kabbalah interpretation over the Jewish texts and determined that man must descend into sin – inverting the laws of Torah – to bring about the return of the Shattered God.


Sabbateanism

Rectifications or repairs or restorations to bring about the return of the Tetragrammaton are called Tikkun. These are acts performed that will reverberate throughout the universe to allow for the Shattered God to gather its sparks.

Now, the manner in which Zevi applied the metaphysical realm of Kabbalah, the fourth realm, he drew from the Torah and Talmud that God has been dispersed throughout the universe into sparks of light upon creation of man. It is said that God has to remove himself, from his space, in order for creation to have occurred. Upon this event, God became the Shattered God.

This is another duality: God removed himself – from himself – to create space for Man. It is seemingly a paradoxical duality.

According to Zevi, further bolstered by the influential Nathan of Gaza, for God to be restored whole, mankind had to descend into sin. If mankind took this path, the Shattered God will collect itself, collect these sparks, to return to whole, to redeem what he created. The Sabbatean way was redemption through sin.

Zevi said all that is bad is actually good. Manipulation, sexual perversion, adultery, stealing – sins necessary to restore God. Half of the known Jewish world was spellbound by this notion around 1666. This is very important.

When one contemplates the seemingly duplicitous nature of one’s “Greatest Ally ™” – one wonders – is there a spiritual element at play? A divine ordainment a certain identity admonishes upon themselves?

Zevi said: “Praised be He who permits the forbidden.”


Significance of the Location: Ottoman Empire

Sabbateanism arose throughout Eastern Europe, the Middle East, Northern Africa and even within many of the influential Jewish communities in Central and Western Europe. Even with the passing of Zevi, Sabbateanism had taken on its own form – a flavor of antinomianistic faith swept through all of society, even outside of Judaism.

Turkey (the country currently defined by its borders) was the home of Zevi. One of the important things about Zevi, in addition to resistance by some the high rabbis to this radical method of redemption through sin – ultimately the Sultan of the Ottoman Empire felt threatened, as Zevi made the proclamation that he wanted to become King. Zevi was imprisoned, long and short of this – he remained so inspirational whilst imprisoned that he was given a choice to live, he had to convert to Islam.

Other Jews following Zevi converted as well. For optics, appearances.

Thereafter these new Muslims were known as Dönme.

By the 1680s, the Dönme had congregated in Salonica, the cosmopolitan and majority-Jewish city in the Ottoman Empire. For the next 250 years, they would lead an independent communal life—intermarrying, doing business together, maintaining their own shrines, and handing down their secret traditions.



In Part Five, we will venture into the “Second False Messiah”, the Occult, Revolution, birth of Left/Right alignments, Marxism, the Bolsheviks, the capitalists behind the revolutionaries, psychoanalysis (and its affect on ideology), Weimar Republic, Frankfurt School and analysis of Critical Theory origins.

The EU’S Role in Libya’s Migrant Trafficking – from Katehon via AltWorld

By Ramona Wadi


To perceive refugees as a dissociated part of the wider narrative is a violation in itself, but who will hold the bloc politically accountable for delegating distasteful tasks to the Libyan coastguard?

In mid-July, Italy’s Chamber of Deputies approved renewing funding to the Libyan coastguard, despite non-governmental organisations urging the authorities to stop financing the failed state’s human trafficking network. Only a day earlier, Amnesty International released a report detailing the trafficking and violations occurring across Libya’s detention centres. European countries have downplayed the documented atrocities against migrants in Libya, preferring to focus on keeping the statistics down.

This week, a boat capsized just off Libya’s coast, with 57 African migrants now presumed dead, among them 20 women and two children. The International Organisation for Migration in Libya (IOM) recently established that almost 6,000 migrants were intercepted and returned to Libya this year so far. Migrants known to have perished in the Mediterranean this year number 970.

International interference in Libya since 2011 and the fall of Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi has resulted in a country in which militias compete for territory and power. Vested UN and international interests in the country have exacerbated the humanitarian ramifications.

While the deals which the EU reached with the Libyan coastguard have been deemed controversial by human rights organisations, public sentiment in Europe veers towards pushback. Migration is played as a powerful card across the political spectrum, with both governments and the public fomenting racism and xenophobia. The result is widespread oblivion about the politics which created refugees and failed states.

With governments focused on statistics, reports such as the recent one by Amnesty International exist to inform only those who are already well-informed. Hence the absence of connecting capsized boats to deliberate damage inflicted by the Libyan coastguard to the vessels, resulting in deaths away from Europe’s shores. Neither is the complicity between Libya and European states made evident in terms of the EU financing abuses and torture in Libya’s detention camps. The rift between politics and non-governmental organisations, in the case of migrants, has been reduced to accusations of trafficking, whereas political culpability, which plays a major role in terms of funding the occurring atrocities, is kept out of focus.

In one instance in July this year, the Libyan coastguard was filmed firing at migrants in Malta’s Search and Rescue (SAR) area. The Libyan coastguard also attempted to ram the boat carrying migrants several times.

Researchers have established a link between European arms sales and increased displacement of people. The link between Italy’s funding of the Libyan coastguard and the interception of migrants was also included in the report.

Testimony published in Amnesty International’s report is chilling. “Death in Libya: it’s normal. No one will look for you and no one will find you,” states one quote by a 21 year old male refugee. The oblivion extends beyond Libya. With European governments intent on keeping migrants away from Europe’s shores, the bloc, which is purportedly concerned with human rights, finds it easier to neglect its obligations. No one in Libya would look for a refugee, and no one in Europe would, either, especially since the EU is paying Libya to do its dirty work.

Amnesty International called upon the EU to ensure accountability. However, accountability from within the same paradigm of exploitation will merely create new victims. The EU cheered in 2011 when the NATO coalition intervened in Libya for regime change under the guise of bringing democracy. One bloody consequence of the decision has been the increase in human trafficking of migrants, which the EU sought to quell through militarisation and surveillance, but never through addressing its wrongs. To perceive refugees as a dissociated part of the wider narrative is a violation in itself, but who will hold the bloc politically accountable for delegating distasteful tasks to the Libyan coastguard?

Source: TheAltWorld