Germany’s Position in America’s New World Order • Michael Hudson

Originally Published on November 2, 2022

Source: Michael Hudson

Germany has become an economic satellite of America’s New Cold War with Russia, China and the rest of Eurasia.
Germany and other NATO countries have been told to impose trade and investment sanctions upon themselves that will outlast today’s proxy war in Ukraine. U.S. President Biden and his State Department spokesmen have explained that Ukraine is just the opening arena in a much broader dynamic that is splitting the world into two opposing sets of economic alliances. This global fracture promises to be a ten- or twenty-year struggle to determine whether the world economy will be a unipolar U.S.-centered dollarized economy, or a multipolar, multi-currency world centered on the Eurasian heartland with mixed public/private economies.

President Biden has characterized this split as being between democracies and autocracies. The terminology is typical Orwellian double-speak. By “democracies” he means the U.S. and allied Western financial oligarchies. Their aim is to shift economic planning out of the hands of elected governments to Wall Street and other financial centers under U.S. control. U.S. diplomats use the International Monetary Fund and World Bank to demand privatization of the world’s infrastructure and dependency on U.S. technology, oil and food exports.

By “autocracy,” Biden means countries resisting this financialization and privatization takeover. In practice, U.S. rhetoric means promoting its own economic growth and living standards, keeping finance and banking as public utilities. What basically is at issue is whether economies will be planned by banking centers to create financial wealth – by privatizing basic infrastructure, public utilities and social services such as health care into monopolies – or by raising living standards and prosperity by keeping banking and money creation, public health, education, transportation and communications in public hands.

The country suffering the most “collateral damage” in this global fracture is Germany. As Europe’s most advanced industrial economy, German steel, chemicals, machinery, automotives and other consumer goods are the most highly dependent on imports of Russian gas, oil and metals from aluminum to titanium and palladium. Yet despite two Nord Stream pipelines built to provide Germany with low-priced energy, Germany has been told to cut itself off from Russian gas and de-industrialize. This means the end of its economic preeminence. The key to GDP growth in Germany, as in other countries, is energy consumption per worker.

These anti-Russian sanctions make today’s New Cold War inherently anti-German. U.S. Secretary of State Anthony Blinken has said that Germany should replace low-priced Russian pipeline gas with high-priced U.S. LNG gas. To import this gas, Germany will have to spend over $5 billion quickly to build port capacity to handle LNG tankers. The effect will be to make German industry uncompetitive. Bankruptcies will spread, employment will decline, and Germany’s pro-NATO leaders will impose a chronic depression and falling living standards.

Most political theory assumes that nations will act in their own self-interest. Otherwise they are satellite countries, not in control of their own fate. Germany is subordinating its industry and living standards to the dictates of U.S. diplomacy and the self-interest of America’s oil and gas sector. It is doing this voluntarily – not because of military force but out of an ideological belief that the world economy should be run by U.S. Cold War planners.

Sometimes it is easier to understand today’s dynamics by stepping away from one’s own immediate situation to look at historical examples of the kind of political diplomacy that one sees splitting today’s world. The closest parallel that I can find is medieval Europe’s fight by the Roman papacy against German kings – the Holy Roman Emperors – in the 13th century. That conflict split Europe along lines much like those of today. A series of popes excommunicated Frederick II and other German kings and mobilized allies to fight against Germany and its control of southern Italy and Sicily.

Western antagonism against the East was incited by the Crusades (1095-1291), just as today’s Cold War is a crusade against economies threatening U.S. dominance of the world. The medieval war against Germany was over who should control Christian Europe: the papacy, with the popes becoming worldly emperors, or secular rulers of individual kingdoms by claiming the power to morally legitimize and accept them.

Medieval Europe’s analogue to America’s New Cold War against China and Russia was the Great Schism in 1054. Demanding unipolar control over Christendom, Leo IX excommunicated the Orthodox Church centered in Constantinople and the entire Christian population that belonged to it. A single bishopric, Rome, cut itself off from the entire Christian world of the time, including the ancient Patriarchates of Alexandria, Antioch, Constantinople and Jerusalem.

This break-away created a political problem for Roman diplomacy: How to hold all the Western European kingdoms under its control and claim the right for financial subsidy from them. That aim required subordinating secular kings to papal religious authority. In 1074, Gregory VII, Hildebrand, announced 27 Papal Dictates outlining the administrative strategy for Rome to lock in its power over Europe.

These papal demands are in striking parallel to today’s U.S. diplomacy. In both cases military and worldly interests require a sublimation in the form of an ideological crusading spirit to cement the sense of solidarity that any system of imperial domination requires. The logic is timeless and universal.

The Papal Dictates were radical in two major ways. First of all, they elevated the bishop of Rome above all other bishoprics, creating the modern papacy. Clause 3 ruled that the pope alone had the power of investiture to appoint bishops or to depose or reinstate them. Reinforcing this, Clause 25 gave the right of appointing (or deposing) bishops to the pope, not to local rulers. And Clause 12 gave the pope the right to depose emperors, following Clause 9, obliging “all princes to kiss the feet of the Pope alone” in order to be deemed legitimate rulers.

Likewise today, U.S. diplomats claim the right to name who should be recognized as a nation’s head of state. In 1953 they overthrew Iran’s elected leader and replaced him with the Shah’s military dictatorship. That principle gives U.S. diplomats the right to sponsor “color revolutions” for regime-change, such as their sponsorship of Latin American military dictatorships creating client oligarchies to serve U.S. corporate and financial interests. The 2014 coup in Ukraine is just the latest exercise of this U.S. right to appoint and depose leaders.

More recently, U.S. diplomats have appointed Juan Guaidó as Venezuela’s head of state instead of its elected president, and turned over that country’s gold reserves to him. President Biden has insisted that Russia must remove Putin and put a more pro-U.S. leader in his place. This “right” to select heads of state has been a constant in U.S. policy spanning its long history of political meddling in European political affairs since World War II.

The second radical feature of the Papal Dictates was their exclusion of all ideology and policy that diverged from papal authority. Clause 2 stated that only the Pope could be called “Universal.” Any disagreement was, by definition, heretical. Clause 17 stated that no chapter or book could be considered canonical without papal authority.

A similar demand as is being made by today’s U.S.-sponsored ideology of financialized and privatized “free markets,” meaning deregulation of government power to shape economies in interests other than those of U.S.-centered financial and corporate elites.

The demand for universality in today’s New Cold War is cloaked in the language of “democracy.” But the definition of democracy in today’s New Cold War is simply “pro-U.S.,” and specifically neoliberal privatization as the U.S.-sponsored new economic religion. This ethic is deemed to be “science,” as in the quasi-Nobel Memorial Prize in the Economic Sciences. That is the modern euphemism for neoliberal Chicago-School junk economics, IMF austerity programs and tax favoritism for the wealthy.

The Papal Dictates spelt out a strategy for locking in unipolar control over secular realms. They asserted papal precedence over worldly kings, above all over Germany’s Holy Roman Emperors. Clause 26 gave popes authority to excommunicate whomever was “not at peace with the Roman Church.” That principle implied the concluding Clause 27, enabling the pope to “absolve subjects from their fealty to wicked men.” This encouraged the medieval version of “color revolutions” to bring about regime change.

What united countries in this solidarity was an antagonism to societies not subject to centralized papal control – the Moslem Infidels who held Jerusalem, and also the French Cathars and anyone else deemed to be a heretic. Above all there was hostility toward regions strong enough to resist papal demands for financial tribute.

Today’s counterpart to such ideological power to excommunicate heretics resisting demands for obedience and tribute would be the World Trade Organization, World Bank and IMF dictating economic practices and setting “conditionalities” for all member governments to follow, on pain of U.S. sanctions – the modern version of excommunication of countries not accepting U.S. suzerainty. Clause 19 of the Dictates ruled that the pope could be judged by no one – just as today, the United States refuses to subject its actions to rulings by the World Court. Likewise today, U.S. dictates via NATO and other arms (such as the IMF and World Bank) are expected to be followed by U.S. satellites without question. As Margaret Thatcher said of her neoliberal privatization that destroyed Britain’s public sector, There Is No Alternative (TINA).

My point is to emphasize the analogy with today’s U.S. sanctions against all countries not following its own diplomatic demands. Trade sanctions are a form of excommunication. They reverse the 1648 Treaty of Westphalia’s principle that made each country and its rulers independent from foreign meddling. President Biden characterizes U.S. interference as ensuring his new antithesis between “democracy” and “autocracy.” By democracy he means a client oligarchy under U.S. control, creating financial wealth by reducing living standards for labor, as opposed to mixed public/private economies aiming at promoting living standards and social solidarity.

As I have mentioned, by excommunicating the Orthodox Church centered in Constantinople and its Christian population, the Great Schism created the fateful religious dividing line that has split “the West” from the East for the past millennium. That split was so important that Vladimir Putin cited it as part of his September 30, 2022 speech describing today’s break away from the U.S. and NATO centered Western economies.

The 12th and 13th centuries saw Norman conquerors of England, France and other countries, along with German kings, protest repeatedly, be excommunicated repeatedly, yet ultimately succumb to papal demands. It took until the 16th century for Martin Luther, Zwingli and Henry VIII finally to create a Protestant alternative to Rome, making Western Christianity multi-polar.

Why did it take so long? The answer is that the Crusades provided an organizing ideological gravity. That was the medieval analogy to today’s New Cold War between East and West. The Crusades created a spiritual focus of “moral reform” by mobilizing hatred against “the other” – the Moslem East, and increasingly Jews and European Christian dissenters from Roman control. That was the medieval analogy to today’s neoliberal “free market” doctrines of America’s financial oligarchy and its hostility to China, Russia and other nations not following that ideology.

In today’s New Cold War, the West’s neoliberal ideology is mobilizing fear and hatred of “the other,” demonizing nations that follow an independent path as “autocratic regimes.” Outright racism is fostered toward entire peoples, as evident in the Russophobia and Cancel Culture currently sweeping the West.

Just as Western Christianity’s multi-polar transition required the 16th century’s Protestant alternative, the Eurasian heartland’s break from the bank-centered NATO West must be consolidated by an alternative ideology regarding how to organize mixed public/private economies and their financial infrastructure.

Medieval churches in the West were drained of their alms and endowments to contribute Peter’s Pence and other subsidy to the papacy for the wars it was fighting against rulers who resisted papal demands. England played the role of major victim that Germany plays today. Enormous English taxes were levied ostensibly to finance the Crusades were diverted to fight Frederick II, Conrad and Manfred in Sicily. That diversion was financed by papal bankers from northern Italy (Lombards and Cahorsins), and became royal debts passed down throughout the economy.

England’s barons waged a civil war against Henry II in the 1260s, ending his complicity in sacrificing the economy to papal demands.

What ended the papacy’s power over other countries was the ending of its war against the East. When the Crusaders lost Acre, the capital of Jerusalem in 1291, the papacy lost its control over Christendom. There was no more “evil” to fight, and the “good” had lost its center of gravity and coherence. In 1307, France’s Philip IV (“the Fair”) seized the Church’s great military banking order’s wealth, that of the Templars in the Paris Temple. Other rulers also nationalized the Templars, and monetary systems were taken out of the hands of the Church. Without a common enemy defined and mobilized by Rome, the papacy lost its unipolar ideological power over Western Europe.

The modern equivalent to the rejection of the Templars and papal finance would be for countries to withdraw from America’s New Cold War. They would reject the dollar standard and the U.S. banking and financial system that is happening as more and more countries see Russia and China not as adversaries but as presenting great opportunities for mutual economic advantage.

The broken promise of mutual gain between Germany and Russia
The dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991 promised an end to the Cold War. The Warsaw Pact was disbanded, Germany was reunified, and American diplomats promised an end to NATO, because a Soviet military threat no longer existed. Russian leaders indulged in the hope that, as President Putin expressed it, a new pan-European economy would be created from Lisbon to Vladivostok. Germany in particular was expected to take the lead in investing in Russia and restructuring its industry along more efficient lines. Russia would pay for this technology transfer by supplying gas and oil, along with nickel, aluminium, titanium and palladium.

There was no anticipation that NATO would be expanded to threaten a New Cold War, much less that it would back Ukraine, recognized as the most corrupt kleptocracy in Europe, into being led by extremist parties identifying themselves by German Nazi insignia.

How do we explain why the seemingly logical potential of mutual gain between Western Europe and the former Soviet economies turned into a sponsorship of oligarchic kleptocracies. The Nord Stream pipeline’s destruction capsulizes the dynamics in a nutshell. For almost a decade a constant U.S. demand has been for Germany to reject its reliance on Russian energy. These demands were opposed by Gerhardt Schroeder, Angela Merkel and German business leaders. They pointed to the obvious economic logic of mutual trade of German manufactures for Russian raw materials.
The U.S. problem was how to stop Germany from approving the Nord Stream 2 pipeline.

Victoria Nuland, President Biden and other U.S. diplomats demonstrated that the way to do that was to incite a hatred of Russia. The New Cold War was framed as a new Crusade. That was how George W. Bush had described America’s attack on Iraq to seize its oil wells. The U.S.-sponsored 2014 coup created a puppet Ukrainian regime that has spent eight years bombing of the Russian-speaking Eastern provinces. NATO thus incited a Russian military response. The incitement was successful, and the desired Russian response was duly labeled an unprovoked atrocity. Its protection of civilians was depicted in the NATO-sponsored media as being so offensive as to deserve the trade and investment sanctions that have been imposed since February. That is what a Crusade means.

The result is that the world is splitting in two camps: the U.S.-centered NATO, and the emerging Eurasian coalition. One byproduct of this dynamic has been to leave Germany unable to pursue the economic policy of mutually advantageous trade and investment relations with Russia (and perhaps also China). German Chancellor Olaf Sholz is going to China this week to demand that it dismantle is public sector and stops subsidizing its economy, or else Germany and Europe will impose sanctions on trade with China. There is no way that China could meet this ridiculous demand, any more than the United States or any other industrial economy would stop subsidizing their own computer-chip and other key sectors. The German Council on Foreign Relations is a neoliberal “libertarian” arm of NATO demanding German de-industrialization and dependency on the United States for its trade, excluding China, Russia and their allies. This promises to be the final nail in Germany’s economic coffin.

Another byproduct of America’s New Cold War has been to end any international plan to stem global warming. A keystone of U.S. economic diplomacy is for its oil companies and those of its NATO allies to control the world’s oil and gas supply – that is, to reduce dependence on carbon-based fuels. That is what the NATO war in Iraq, Libya, Syria, Afghanistan and Ukraine was about. It is not as abstract as “Democracies vs. Autocracies.” It is about the U.S. ability to harm other countries by disrupting their access to energy and other basic needs.

Without the New Cold War’s “good vs. evil” narrative, U.S. sanctions will lose their raison d’etre in this U.S. attack on environmental protection, and on mutual trade between Western Europe and Russia and China. That is the context for today’s fight in Ukraine, which is to be merely the first step in the anticipated 20 year fight by the US to prevent the world from becoming multipolar. This process will lock Germany and Europe into dependence on the U.S. supplies of LNG.

The trick is to try and convince Germany that it is dependent on the United States for its military security. What Germany really needs protection from is the U.S. war against China and Russia that is marginalizing and “Ukrainianizing” Europe.

There have been no calls by Western governments for a negotiated end to this war, because no war has been declared in Ukraine. The United States does not declare war anywhere, because that would require a Congressional declaration under the U.S. Constitution. So U.S. and NATO armies bomb, organize color revolutions, meddle in domestic politics (rendering the 1648 Westphalia agreements obsolete), and impose the sanctions that are tearing Germany and its European neighbors apart.

How can negotiations “end” a war that either has no declaration of war, or is a long-term strategy of total unipolar world domination?

The answer is that no ending can come until an alternative to the present U.S.-centered set of international institutions is replaced. That requires the creation of new institutions reflecting an alternative to the neoliberal bank-centered view that economies should be privatized with central planning by financial centers. Rosa Luxemburg characterized the choice as being between socialism and barbarism. I have sketched out the political dynamics of an alternative in my recent book, The Destiny of Civilization.

Should Europeans ‘Thank’ the Americans for Destroying Nord Stream? – Strategic Culture Foundation

Source: Strategic Culture Foundation

Europe should have heeded the advice of Henry Kissinger: “To be an enemy of the U.S. is dangerous, but to be a friend is fatal.”

With an investigation continuing into the destruction of the Nord Stream gas pipeline that provided energy supplies to Europe from Russia, there appears to be just one prime suspect, and that should surprise nobody.

Following the sabotage of the Nord Stream 1 and 2 gas pipelines, former Polish Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski already seemed to know the identity of the perpetrator when he tweeted out: “Thank you, USA.”

At first glance, it seemed that Sikorski was speaking sarcastically, berating Washington for carrying out an attack that will have severe repercussions for the people of Europe. After all, how could anyone see any good coming from the termination of Europe’s primary source of gas reserves with winter just around the corner? It was Sikorski’s homeland of Poland, after all, that urged its citizens to collect firewood in the face of dwindling gas reserves.

In fact, the Polish diplomat was speaking one-hundred percent literally, thanking the United States for plunging the continent deeper into the abyss. This has been the attitude of European leaders from the start of Russia’s special military operation in Ukraine: ‘we will accept our self-destruction as scripted by Washington policymakers so long as the baddies in Moscow hears our virtue-signaling whimpers and screams.’ European capitals are about to learn the hard way that virtue signaling does not put food on the table or heat homes.

Judging by the rising temperature in Europe, however, last seen in Italy where a far-right leader has come to power on the wave of voters fed up with high electricity bills and loose immigration, the phrase ‘Thank you, USA’ may eventually be chiseled into Europe’s tombstone.

But first, the big question: was the United States really responsible for the destruction of Nord Stream, as Sikorski seems to believe? Well, if we were are to take bumbling Joe Biden at his word, then the answer would seem to be yes.

“If Russia invades, that means tanks or troops crossing the border of Ukraine, again, then there will be — there will be no longer a Nord Stream 2,” the U.S. leader told reporters two weeks before Russia began its Ukrainian mission. “We will bring an end to it.”

When asked to specify, Biden responded, “I promise you, we’ll be able to do it.”

There are other clues that point to American complicity.

On September 2, an American helicopter with the call sign FFAB123 was observed maneuvering in the area of the Nord Stream pipelines. According to the site, six aircraft used this call sign that day, of which the tail numbers of three were established. All of them were Sikorsky MH-60S. By overlaying the FFAB123 route on the scheme marking the areas of the explosions, it is observable that the helicopter either flew along the Nord Stream-2 route, or exactly between the points where the ‘accident’ occurred.

Meanwhile, on Twitter, there are screenshots of other American aircraft flights as of September 13th in exactly the same area. In June there was an article in Sea Power magazine where the Americans boast of experiments in the field of underwater drones that they set up at the BALTOPS 22 exercises – in the area of Bornholm Island, the Danish island where the explosions were reported to have occurred.

“Experimentation was conducted off the coast of Bornholm, Denmark, with participants from Naval Information Warfare Center Pacific, Naval Undersea Warfare Center Newport, and Mine Warfare Readiness and Effectiveness Measuring all under the direction of U.S. 6th Fleet Task Force 68,” Sea Power reports.

Such an “experiment” would have required the deep-sea equipment needed for reaching the depths where the Nord Stream pipelines are located.

Finally, here’s one last tantalizing piece of information for all of the ‘coincidence theorists’ out there. On the day after Nord Stream 1 and 2 went offline, Poland, Norway and Denmark’s leaders attended the opening ceremony of the new Baltic Pipe, which will transport natural gas from Norway via Denmark and through the Baltic Sea to, yes, Sikorski’s ferociously Russophobic homeland of Poland. Yes, just a coincidence.

However, the main motivating factor for Washington having a hand in destroying Nord Stream is the awesome powers – both financial and political – that it will reap. The economic crisis in Europe is already forcing companies and corporations to consider relocating to the U.S., which is providing a better business environment and more or less affordable electricity bills.

And after the destruction of Nord Stream, the economic situation on the continent will deteriorate significantly. Even though the NS-II was not launched, there was the chance of its launch, and this “chance” had a considerable effect on the market. Now, without its main energy supplier, Europe is doomed while America will soar.

The economic destruction of Europe makes it totally dependent on the U.S. economically, politically, and militarily, turning it into a toothless tiger with no political will and independence. At the same time, Europe will become almost completely dependent on the U.S. for its (prohibitive) gas. The United States plans to supply at least 15 billion cubic metres (bcm) of liquefied natural gas (LNG) to European Union markets this year as Europe seeks to wean itself off Russian gas supplies.

In other words, the transformation of the EU into a banana republic – albeit it one in the northern hemisphere with winter quickly approaching – has already begun.

Europe, you really should have heeded the advice of Henry Kissinger, who understands the nature of the U.S. better than anyone: “To be an enemy of the U.S. is dangerous, but to be a friend is fatal.”

Lügenpresse!!! Business Insider Pure FUCKERY VS. American Advertising, Planned Obsolescence, Consumerist Capital, Decimation of Our Communities and Permanently Fractured Public Trust

By Eric • (old post from 2021)

Business Insider is an irredeemable, absolute shit publication. And that’s a shame for time was, this publication was highly objective, respectable and – well – it performed this thing once called journalism.

This article was in yesterday’s propaganda pulpit:

America isn’t running out of everything just because of a supply-chain crisis. America is running out of everything because Americans are buying so much stuff.

The article is an insult to ordinary people. The energy is baked within the article is throwing the blame for a worldwide, supply chain jamboozle – however this article is throwing the blame on YOU. ORDINARY, HARDWORKING PEOPLE. For being consumers. In a purely consumerist economic framework. WHO IS STILL ASLEEP?!?

This system has declared war on all of us. This system; the fusion of industry, finance, tech, pharma, defense-contractors interlaced with our Legislative, Executive and Judicial branches of policy makers. Their ideas took hold in academia. And yes – their mouthpiece is that fucking fake and gay mainstream media. The system sticks their finger in our fucking face and spews pure horseshit – with their straight LIES and we as grown adults that know a couple of three things about reality – we are to accept their messages of post-truth? We are in a post-truth era. We have invisible monsters abound – Forever Virus, Cyber Herpes (which will be fabricated), climate emergency hoax. This system is pushing the masses that accept their message at face-value into a place where they expect you to be grateful you are receiving fresh air through an eye dropper, if your social credit is in check with whatever the fuck CNN, Chuck Schumer, Slate, Lindsey Graham, Mother Jones, Bill Gates, Cardi B, B’nai B’rith and a group of non-binary, grass fed, fucking mezzofanooks have conjured up on Twitter.

The system has it’s end game set on phasing you out. Their aim is to erase and replace you with a climate change refugee. you are to accept this as atoning for the sin of Western Civilization and usher in YOUR OWN DESTRUCTION.

I do not even need to pull quotes from the Business Insider article. It’s absolute SHIT. Instead I will share with you exactly what you already know to be true. Reality!

Consumerist Capitalism: Sizzling Plates and Crinkly Bags

First off, sales, advertising and marketing is an industry in of itself in America and it is a major sector of whatever still exists of our real economy. Think Chili’s/Applebee’s/Fridays/Longhorn Steakhouse chain restaurants – those restaurants stick a mediocre piece of meat on a plate – a plate that is sizzling literally sizzling hot. And LOUD. – SIZZLE BRICKA-BRACKA-FIRECRACKER-SISS-BOOM-BAH – it is subliminally captivating – the plate that the server carries across the restaurant and everyone turns their head and oooh-ahhhh-oooh…this is not done by accident. It’s a carefully conjured technique to sell the sizzle – not the steak.

Have you ever encountered a bag of potato chips? The crumply, noisy, unable-to-be-ignored sensation known as a potato chip bag. That thing was specifically designed as a weapon of aural ultra-mega terrorism. No one can escape the grip of that crinkling fucking bag. Tell me truthfully you haven’t heard that bag crinkle and wondered what the fuck some person was eating. If you can, than you are in on the scam – hahah. The portions, packaging, placement and positioning of potato chips – no one can deny the institutional status that potato chips have in the land of Uncle Sam.

Uncle Sam. Uncle Sam and Aunty Semite. Who arranged this marriage? Let’s not deviate …yet.

Our Economic, Social and Ideological Reality

America has been in the throws of Neo-Liberal, debt-laden, borderless, raceless, genderless, cosmopolitan, consumerist capital at a more exponential rate every single day America pushes past 1945. I wasn’t alive then, yet I’ve read America had some relatively wholesome years in the late 1940s and throughout the 1950s. I get my information from Sopranos reruns for they teach me all the truths that Klaus Schwab, Michael Bloomberg and Larry Fink want you to never know.

American consumer patterns fall into two segmentations of purchasing of goods – inelastic (ie rents, mortgage payments, utilities, food, clothing) and elastic (ie Aston Martins, Air Jordan sneakers, Versace dental floss). This is the cornerstone of the economy and the markets of goods and services. America, more than any country, pushes, pushes, PUSHES products into people’s plain sight and the legerdemain libels of sales, marketing and advertising are set in motion to create a perceived necessity of ownership of a most wife array of elastic economic goods. Materialism is the game to the big swinging dicks on Wall Street, to the dudes in the streets gettin that paper, gaining that clout dawwwwg, to the bugmen waiting for Star Wars Was 88: “Return of the Genderfluid Giardians”, to the tens of millions of kids immersed in social media networks heavily influencing their fashion, diet and tech gadget frenzies – c’mon thirty years ago prior to the internet there was heavy influence from the likes of MTV and FM Radio and what was seen on network television sitcoms themselves as well as the eternal commerical breaks.

That’s what Globohomo-America has become. A never ending fucking commercial break.

Built to Last v. Planned Obsolescence v. Built to Break

Circa 1954, a community – a town – had local shops, owned by local people and sold quality goods to other local people. Through the steady pace of reliability, dependability and trustworthiness of doing business with the members of one’s own community, this allows for trust to be forged. And when there are more and more opportunities for trust to be brokered, this is how a high trust society emerges. A high trust society is one where the environment and behaviors of your neighbors become predictable.

Towns boomed with high trust. And this led way to trade. Neighborhood hardware, toy, sporting goods and book stores. Owned by your neighbor. Perhaps some tools are needed – have a visit the local hardware store. You would speak with the man at the shop and explain the types of jobs you need to get done around the house. The shop keeper knew exactly the types of tools – hammers, screw drivers, wrenches, saws, etc – and the necessary hardware, too – bolts, nails, screws, etc – the owner of this shop right down to the newest, part-time employee knows, with great thoroughness, the entirety of the goods available for sale and in which situations a customer should be shown options as to what is available to get a job done.

The tools each had a warranty. Warranties were rarely exercised. However, if there was a defect, the customer would simply bring the defective item back to the store, the store would replace the item on the spot. Then the store would go about exercising the warranty in due fashion with the manufacturer. You see, the store is part of the community. Beyond it’s reputation it is in the marketplace to conduct good business with it’s neighbors. These were your neighbors you would be doing business with. Members of your community. Participants in the going concern called the high trust society. This still exists in parts of America today however I was born an urbanite and have not seen such characteristics interwoven within my community since 1985. Items were built to last.

Now, as neighborhood stores got gobbled up by regional retailers and regional retailers the phenom of the shopping mall exploded all throughout America. I don’t have the statistics on this nor do I care to look this up for we can state this is my from my own anecdotal interactions with the universe. I’d be willing to bet there is at least one other person that is familiar with the explosion of the shopping mall phenotype!

The shopping mall phenotype was born in “it’s the nineties” Americana. Look, the point I am making here as it relates back to the Talmud Business Insider article – in the nineties, packs and packs of kids in suburban high schools would spend their Friday nights at the shopping mall three towns over, they’d buy clothes – Nike, Guess, Levi’s, Ray-Ban perhaps, or maybe they were naz-Goth kids and bought alot of black clothing and jewelry, maybe they were trendy young women and shopped at The Limited, or Abercrombie, maybe they shopped at Lids and bought $55 hats, maybe they bought $85 dollar Ralph Lauren Polo sweatshirts at Macy’s, maybe they bought tshirts of Nirvana, Metallica, Marilyn Manson, Tool, Alice in Chains, maybe they bought all of those records, cassette tapes, compact discs too.

(by the way, the purchase of the stylish attire was specifically purchased to be worn the following Friday night at the mall, to conduct the same ritual once more)

Records to Cassette tapes to Compact Discs. This was not simply a solution for having to resort to a #2 pencil to re-spool a cassette tape’s tape run amuck. This is called planned obsolescence. There are many components of industry involved here. The planned transition to an augmentation of what worked perfectly fine before. See, if industry moguls in plastics, metals, magnetic tape, vinyl, audio/video hardware, audio/video auxillary components (like receivers and subwoofers, for instance), assembly lines (we will get to this in a moment), the music industry, the media (when I say media I am not speaking solely upon news. Media, the mass media juggernauts, own the music labels, the publishing companies, the radio broadcasts, the magazines, the newspapers, the movie studios, the comic books, the concert venues, the movie theaters, the popcorn vendor at the movie theater, etcetera etcetera), these forces of industry have and do and if owning a few nice things in the year 2030 does not violate the Zero-Carbon-Censorship-Vax-Democracy-rebirthingOfCorporateValueCircular-GreenBlueCommunitarianismOfBlackrock-blockchainReappropriation1619 laws of Fink-Schwab-Bloomberg, will one be allowed to purchase a guitar? Will it actually be an air guitar like Bill and Ted’s Excellent Adventure? This is not even hyperbole as to attempting to illustrate what a decade of a completely post-truth, inverted reality we will be facing. You will pretend to have a guitar in your hands, although it might not work because all of the air has been sequestered by the Davos.

Planned Obsolescence is most prominent in all forms of computer technology. Servers, desktops, laptops, mobile phones, smart watches, etc. The mesh of specs, the CPU, amount of RAM, ROM, storage, graphics card etc – the piece of hardware is planned to lag as the operating systems, software, web applications, etc are built to be much more robust going forward. The hardware is static in it’s capabilities. Therefore, be it 18, 24 or 36 months, to stay connected to the digital emulation of your life, you must upgrade devices. Yet you can see this is a ploy, a merchant’s ploy, to require you to expend money into an elastic good. This is a malicious technique. This is not as bad as it gets.

Built to Break and Be Replaced • Goods from the Chinamerification-verse

This is where we are at. Right now. The woman that wrote the article in the Business Insider gave no consideration to what has become of the industrial powerhouse the United States once was. The only reason ordinary people would be purchasing more of anything is the fact that everything you buy from Walmart is a piece of shit that is built to break and be replaced. And the consumer is doomed, for they must participate. Vacuums break within months. Lawnmowers are complete shit. Drills malfunction. Coolers you use to out ice and beverages and bring to the job or maybe fishing, or to the beach – yeah, those spout leaks within a season’s end. Baseball gloves disintegrate. Basketballs never, ever inflate properly. The pump/needle apparatus to inflate the basketball bends and breaks in the basketball. It happens alot. The bicycle tire pumps break sometimes on first use. Even bandaids don’t stick like they used to.

You see, all of those neighborhood hardware stores are gone. In their place are physciatrist, psychologist and insurance offices. Even the regional retailers have been collapsed into the vortex of the intentional globalized consolidation of wealth into the coffers of the very few. This was the intention of globalization all along. Never was it intended to expand markets, increase competition, stimulate innovation, encourage creation and risk, create an exponential level of opportunities to those that may have previously been prohibited from taking part in “free market enterprise.”

Trilateral Commission

The Trilateral Commission was formed between David Rockefeller, Zbigniew Brzezinski and Henry Kissinger in the early 1970s. The purpose of the rigging together if the Trilateral Commission was to export labor to foreign markets that would substantially undercut the existing union structured compensation packages woven within American manufacturing operations. It was indeed, the livelihoods of tens of millions of Americans that were able to first participate in Consumerist Capitalism, beginning post-1945 – the livelihoods came from manufacturing jobs.

Radios, railroads, rifles, rafts, rope – the actual rewind-buttons that once fit into that cassette tape player – the depth and breadth of the scope of American manufacturing covered it all. Everything was built inhouse.

Fake and Gay: Democrats v. Republicans

There was no protection being afforded to the coming dismantling of the American labor market, the high trust society, the demographics of the population and to the very concept of national sovereignty at the onset of 1992. When it came to globalization in the context of elections and scampaigns, Democrats took a favorable view of globalization for by stripping the working class of work, this could be weaponized purely for political theatre purposes by the Democrats, once known as the “working man’s party.” For Republicans, keep in mind, circa 1992, the GOP was the party of the religious, those that are quite deliberate in their celebration of Constitutional Law and finally, the then financial elite. The very financial elite that stood to have their profitability receive a healthy injection due to the prospect of enormous reduction of labor expenses. Labor includes the wages, payroll taxes, health insurance, retirement plans and other benefits that employees are paid in the United States. Especially with the labor unions behind employees.

Therefore, there was no motivation for career politicians to interject and create any type of policy insulating and isolating the labor exportation.

Everything is now built to break and be replaced.

1992: European Union/NAFTA/Commerical Internet • Globalization Launched

Internet: On 6 August 1991, the World Wide Web officially became open to the general public for non-commercial use.

In 1992, the U.S. Congress passed the Scientific and Advanced-Technology Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1862(g), which allowed NSF to support access by the research and education communities to computer networks which were not used exclusively for research and education purposes, thus permitting NSFNET to interconnect with commercial networks.

This was the first component of a coming seismic shift. The fact that commercial use of the World Wide Web – which was absolutely booming, BOOMING, worldwide, in terms of sudden interconnectivity of ideas that transcended the notion of boundaries, of borders, across the globe. For corporate raiders, this was digital sovereignty. Digital Sovereignty would supercede the aspect of national sovereignty as defined by borders. Yes…the Trilateral Commission pioneered this plan for decades, in the spirit of the international central banking cabal and all of it’s gusto, and with it’s blessings as well (remember that Rothschild funded Rockefeller, remember that Warburg and Schiff funded the Bolshevik Revolution).

The writing was on the wall ..or in cyberspace – burial plots for your nation-state, sovereignty, ability to function independently outside of the reach of globalist aspirations, was all coming crashing down.

NAFTA • North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) established a free-trade zone in North America; it was signed in 1992 by Canada, Mexico, and the United States and took effect on Jan. 1, 1994. NAFTA immediately lifted tariffs on the majority of goods produced by the signatory nations.

NAFTA was written to function within the trade mechanisms of United States, Canada and Mexico. NAFTA stated in 1992 that the agreement “calls for the gradual elimination, over a period of 15 years, of most remaining barriers to cross-border investment and to the movement of goods and services among the three countries.”

This was a key component to true globalization, in terms of trade. The Trilateral Commission had already invested in the Chimericafication infrastructure in China. With NAFTA passed, also in 1992, the Chimericafication effect could easily spread a hop, skip and a jump away, across the southern border. Fortune 500 companies, Russell 2000 companies began exporting their labor “overseas” – American labor systematically dismantled and sent to Mexico, El Salvador, Honduras, Dominican Republic, China, Bangladesh, Vietnam, South Korea, India, Pakistan, Turkey, Morocco, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan… Globalization was full throttle ….firing on all cylinders, on all four compass points…

European Union: Maastricht Treaty, came into effect at the end of 1992, on January 1st, 1993 to be exact. The Maastricht Treaty, officially known as the Treaty on European Union, laid the foundations for the European Union as we know it today. The Maastricht Treaty significantly increased cooperation between European countries in a number of new areas:

  • Twelve countries; Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain and the United Kingdom, signed the agreement on February 7, 1992.Since then, a further sixteen countries have joined the EU and adopted the rules set out in the Maastricht Treaty or in the treaties that followed later (the United Kingdom has withdrawn from the European Union, the movement known as Brexit.)
  • The Treaty introduced European citizenship, allowing citizens to reside in and move freely between Member States.
  • The Treaty established a common foreign and security policy with the aim of “safeguarding the common values, fundamental interests and independence of the Union”.
  • The Maastricht Treaty paved the way for the creation of a single European currency: the Euro. It also established the European Central Bank (ECB) and the European System of Central Banks and describes their objectives.
  • The Treaty also established rules on how the Euro would work in practice. This included specifying what a country needs to do to join the Euro area.
  • The Treaty called for synthesis between inflation, levels of public debt, long-term interest rates and exchange rates – in order for a nation’s existing currency to become tethered to the Euro.

So, Lugenpresse…pray tell how you dare attempt to hold Americans accountable for the global supply chain disruptions that have been created directly as a result of the fact that:

  • Everything people buy is a piece of shit built to break.
  • Everything people buy likely crossed an ocean to arrive in the aisles of Walmart.
  • The systematic, intentional dismantling of the American Industrial Economy, in conjunction with the decimation of National Sovereignty to the benefit of the global, corporate entity, to the benefit of the shareholder class – sealed the fate of America, Constitutional Law and ultimately the very American Ethos.
  • Global supply chain disintegration is very real as it’s carefully calculated assembly brought it into existence in the first place.
  • The only thing America now manufacturers are arbitrarily diagnosed behavioral health conditions which fuel this behemoth, ugly, disingenuous new industry. “A psychiatrist? Well that’s a just a racket for the Jews!!! – Livia Soprano, Season One, circa 1999
  • The collapse of America, as well as it’s European cousins, was launched, OFFICIALLY, in 1992. NAFTA is not a conspiracy theory. The European Union is not a conspiracy theory.
  • Fuck you Business Insider.

The energy right here, right now, with all that is happening around us, with the walls closing in, your heritage, your faith, your race, your existence is under both covert and overt assault and it is only going to get worse.

The globalist empire is real, the dual-edged sword that came with globalization was the explosion of the information age. It was within the sanctuary of a once uncensored, uninterrupted, pure, wholesome exchange of information that dissidents worldwide engaged in a twenty year long rapid exchange of corroborating information that confirmed what we all know to be true: a global financial system that is tethered to a debt-based, fiat currency – with which the only intrinsic value once came from a sense of faith in the system.

That faith is long gone. That system has betrayed all of humanity. The system is the absolute enemy. The people are waking up. This is not a collection of words from a wanna-be blogger in Boston. THIS IS A BIG FUCK YOU FINK!!!

There is nothing the system can do to repel what is coming.

That’s right…I am bringing a new fire, it’s the brother-fire, you can’t take my volition from me. From us.

It is with extreme prejudice I show you the the objective reality that lay before us in this time. For I am one who honors tradition .. tradition reveals certain truths… Heads Will Roll…..the natural order of the universe is calling on us all and there are those that will face our fate on our feet…we will never be brought to our knees… history is coming back…everyone is watching the Sopranos again…the Sopranos contains the esoteric, secret, pre-Kabbalah, Challah language and order of all the universe to witness it’s power and glory…my message to the system…with inspiration from some words of Johnny Sack…

Either you begin to take a step back and restore some value in the humanity you wish to eviscerate from the face of the earth…or I will rain a shit storm down on you like you’ve




ITALEXIT. Hype, Hope or Reality?

Artificial Intuition

Brexit is a reality since 23:00 GMT on 31 January 2020. Over the years, the hypothesis of Italy following Britain is gaining popularity. In particular, over the past year, following the irrational, self-inflicted and destructive covid-induced policies and lockdowns, there is revived interest in the idea.

The goal of this blog is not to provide a critique of the idea of Italexit. What we want to focus on are certain aspects that need to be considered seriously before taking the idea seriously and realistically.

It is clear that Italy is not the UK. For starters, the UK has the Pound Sterling, Italy has the Euro, and is deeply integrated into the Euro system. While it took the UK four years to complete the Brexit procedure, that alone suggest in the case of Italy it would take much longer. Let’s also forget the fact that the EU would do everything it…

View original post 1,002 more words

Great Reset: NATO Vying To Be Global Censorship Police… • Helena: The Nationalist Voice

This blog is excellent, excellent insight on the globalist machine.

By: Helena

Source: Helena

NATO is inflamed over the amount of ‘disinformation’ that is plaguing social media platforms. According to their own self image, NATO states: “NATO member countries maintain open civil communications systems, some with very high rates of social media and social messaging use.” Simultaneously, NATO states that false messages and inflammatory statements are a direct danger in “the damage they can do to citizens’ faith in the institutions of democratic governance and resources of public information and discussion.” Therefore, ‘open communication’ must be censored.

These ‘warfare campaigns’ must be silenced in order to have a free open source of information. Please read that again… ‘silencing in order to be free and open source’. Claiming disinformation is warfare sets the stage for the institution of Nazi style laws that prohibit anyone from saying anything deemed disinformation.

Given that humans are currently responsible for tattling on other humans, NATO wants AI to take control.

Currently, certain words or phrases are delisted and are the source of censorship. But together with Johns Hopkins, NATO wants emotions to be targeted. They term this new design as ‘Sentiment Analysis’. If AI determines a particular sentiment is not within the programmed guidelines, a circuit breaker effect would be instituted globally.

Within this algorithm of AI regulatory analysis, censors will not only delete the communication pathway, but could also insert legal action resulting in censor police knocking down doors. All of this is based on The Great RESET of global governance.

Member states of NATO would be required to adopt these censorship mechanisms or face de-alliance.

DISINFORMATION Definition: false information which is intended to mislead, especially propaganda issued by a government organization to a rival power or the media.

In other words, disinformation is born of government propaganda according to That would indicate that the government is using the media to convey the notion that disinformation is parlayed via individuals on social media – which IS the disinformation! Funny word-play!

Johns Hopkins is a partner of NATO. They have other interesting partnership alliances, including with; Tsinghua University in China, China University in Hong Kong, Shanghai Jia Tong University – China, and Nanjing University – China. They have been heavily involved in the Thousand Talent Program in China and have yet to decouple that arrangement despite concerns over the sharing of US intellectual property.

While our media, NATO and White House Handlers would have us believe China is our enemy… Johns Hopkins does not. ODD!

Johns Hopkins is also the designated source of statistics for CoVid cases and deaths via their algorithm. They are a perpetuator of Climate Change Theory including climate change’s racism. An event with two speakers , one from Bloomberg’s Johns Hopkins is scheduled at Harvard the latter part of this month to discuss Climate’s racism.

Given climate is racist, trees are racist, birds are racist, street signs are racist, sidewalks are racist, crayons are racist… the Cloud should be deemed racist given it represents fluffy whiteness. Right?

In 2020, Johns Hopkins contributed $2.4 million to Democrats and $92,000 to Republicans. But they are nonpartisan. Its most recent grant from NIH announced October 2021 is in the amount of $4 million. The purpose of the grant is to study and research the use of psilocybin mushrooms to explore the impact on tobacco addiction. So you might cure that smoking addiction but you’ll be crazy and confined in a mental institution, so who cares…

A total of 85% of Johns Hopkins funding is via federal and state governments – $2.562 million. That means ALL taxpayers are paying for Johns Hopkins to give the money to Democrat PACs… Sounds logical.

Johns Hopkins provides internships for students with: GAVI, UNICEF, WHO and Pan American Health Organization, although a WHO internship was cancelled this year because of CoVid. ???

At the recent NATO Summit, US Defense blunderer, Lloyd Austin, made the following playbook statement with regard to China: “We see an increasing interest in our allies and partners [in the Indo-Pacific] to ensure the region remains free and open, and the rules-based international order remains in place.”

However Jens Stoltenberg was quick to add that Russia continues to take a close second place as the target of demonizing after NATO expelled 8 Russian ‘spies’, errr diplomats. The evidence? NATO declared their decision was based on intelligence and they are not going to comment on their intelligence… Ah

NATO has gone Full ballistic mental in abiding by the Handlers that make the rules. What becomes increasingly clear is that the pedophilia based NATO is being situated to be the global police, not just of coups but of censorship as in Big Brother. Not one UN Peacekeeper or NATO personnel accused of sexual assault was jailed despite more than 2,000 allegations. Just one allegation was from a 12 year old who claimed she was paid 75 cents for each of the 40 men she was prostituted to.

Keeping Fear Alive • City Journal

By John Tierney

Throughout the pandemic, American political and public-health leaders have been following Rahm Emanuel’s classic dictum for power-seeking officials: “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste.” Now they’ve adopted a corollary: you never want a crisis to end.

So they are prolonging the national misery instead of easing it, which could be done with a few simple strategies. Explain to the public that the virus will never disappear but is no longer a mortal threat to the vast majority of Americans. Encourage the minority still at risk to get vaccinated by honestly discussing who is in jeopardy and what scientists have learned about infections. Promote treatments proven to prevent infection and speed recovery while avoiding unproven treatments and mandates that cause collateral damage and generate mistrust. Above all, make it clear to Americans that we finally have reason to celebrate: what once seemed an unprecedented danger is now just one of many pathogens that we know how to live with.

But the nation’s crisismongers aren’t about to relinquish their hold over the public, so they’ve set new goals that are as unachievable as they are unnecessary and harmful. Making vaccines available to every American adult is no longer sufficient; now the crisis cannot end until the entire population has been vaccinated. Instead of focusing efforts on vaccinating the vulnerable, officials obsess on compelling universal obedience, even if that means squandering vaccines on people who already have acquired natural immunity or are at minimal risk of serious illness.

The same progressives who regularly denounce “systemic racism” and “Western imperialism” are now enforcing policies that disproportionately punish minorities and the poor, both in the United States (the majority of black teenagers and young adults in New York have been banished from much of public life by the city’s new vaccine-passport policy) and in the rest of the world. The hypocrisy was deftly captured in a tweet by Martin Kulldorff, the Harvard epidemiologist: “If you favor university vaccine mandates for low-risk American and European students, when there is not enough vaccine for older high-risk people in Asia, Africa and Latin America, please remove your #BLM tags from your Twitter/Facebook profiles.”

Children are being sentenced to another round of unnecessary mask mandates and probably more school closures based on evidence-free warnings from Anthony Fauci and others that the Delta variant will be more deadly to them than the original virus. While the variant is more infectious, the evidence does not show it to be any more lethal. In fact, the current mortality rate among American children with Covid is lower than it was last year—and last year many more children died of the flu than of Covid. One of the most thorough studies, in England, shows that the survival rate for those under 18 with Covid is 99.995 percent. But instead of emphasizing these reassuring statistics, public-health officials like Jerome Adams, the former surgeon general, keep looking for new ways to scare parents and children.

“I’m an anesthesiologist,” he tweeted last weekend. “And a dad. And I can assure you in both capacities that your child will be far more comfortable if they’re in a face mask, than on a ventilator. If you’re making a choice on behalf of a child, please choose based on their comfort, vs yours.” He offered no new evidence that children are at heightened risk from the virus, much less any evidence that a mask would make any difference, but he did make sure to include a gruesome photograph of a child on a ventilator.

It was a new low in public-health demagoguery, but unfortunately not so different from the fearmongering of other officials, the press, and social-media platforms. They lament that a minority of the public remains reluctant to get vaccinated without recognizing that their own tactics are likely a chief cause of this reluctance. They have been misleading people for so long—and censoring challenges to their misinformation—that it’s no wonder polls show that an overwhelming majority of unvaccinated Americans say they don’t trust Fauci or the CDC.

Many of these unvaccinated people have mistaken ideas about vaccine side effects, but they’re not wrong when they tell pollsters that the dangers of the virus have been exaggerated and exploited for political purposes. The White House and its Democratic allies in the press have seized on the seasonal surge in the Sun Belt to attack Republicans for not mandating masks—while largely ignoring surges in Democratic strongholds with mask mandates and other restrictions, like Hawaii, Oregon, and San Francisco.

This political cherry-picking of data has been the norm during the pandemic. During surges last year, Florida and Sweden’s failure to lock down and mandate masks was blamed for the outbreaks—never mind that both places did better than average in limiting mortality over the course of the year. In Sweden, which kept its schools open without masks or social distancing during the spread of the Delta variant this year, the overall mortality rate this year has actually been lower than normal.

The CDC continues to undermine its credibility by claiming strong evidence for the efficacy of lockdowns and mask mandates. Dozens of studies have found that lockdowns are ineffective, and one recent analysis of trends in the United States and other countries found that lockdown policies are associated with an increase in excess deaths. The evidence offered by the CDC for mask mandates is weak, as Jeffrey H. Anderson has documented, and the most rigorous research—from more than a dozen randomized clinical trials—suggests that masks are ineffective (and possibly counterproductive) at stopping viral spread. One recent study, which tracked Covid case growth across the United States, concluded that “mask mandates and use are not associated with slower state-level Covid-19 spread during Covid-19 growth surges.”

Even Robert Redfield, who made unsubstantiated claims for mask efficacy last year while he was directing the CDC, now concedes that there is a “paucity of data” to support mask mandates. When asked if the CDC is wrong to be recommending masks for schoolchildren, he replied, “I’m saying that I haven’t been able to review data that supports that recommendation.”

His successors at the agency, unfortunately, seem less interested in reviewing data than in hiding it. As David Zweig reported in New York, when researchers from the CDC compared Covid-mitigation techniques at 169 elementary schools in Georgia, they found no statistically significant reduction of infections in schools that required masks for students, enforced social distancing, or installed barriers between desks. Those were important findings because it was the first such large study, but the CDC did not even mention them in the summary of research that it published. Instead, the agency went on recommending masks for all students.

The European Union’s equivalent of the CDC, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, has sensibly recommended against masking students under age 12 because of the physical, psychological, and social harms to children, but American officials have made no effort to weigh the costs and benefits. The National Institutes of Health hasn’t even bothered to study the negative impacts of its mask policies on children. Dozens of other researchers, though, have demonstrated an array of problems called “Mask-Induced Exhaustion Syndrome.” The problems include decrease in blood oxygen saturation; increase in blood carbon dioxide; increase in heart and respiratory rates; difficulty breathing; dizziness; headache; drowsiness; and decreased ability to concentrate and think.

Masking children at minimal risk from the virus was justified last year on the grounds that it might prevent infections of vulnerable adults who had no defense against the virus. But now that vaccines are readily available, why harm children for the sake of adults who have deliberately chosen not to protect themselves? Since when do children bear responsibility for adults’ decisions?

The mask mandates for children can’t be justified on ethical or scientific grounds, but they persist because they serve the interests of a certain class of adults. The purpose of this hygiene theater was described with blunt accuracy by Ron DeSantis, the Florida governor and one of the few politicians who has actually been following the science during the pandemic. “Politicians,” he explained, “want to force you to cover your face as a way for them to cover their own asses.”


Europa: The Last Battle (2017 Documentary)

This documentary has fallen victim to Zio-Censorism all over the internet. The description from the producer:

Since the mid-20th century, the world has only ever heard one side of the most horrific war in human history. During the 75 years that have now passed, only a single narrative of the great conflict has been heard. This over simplistic narrative totally ignores the previous decades of critical history leading up to World War II, ignores vital information from the actual war years, and outright fabricates lie after lie after lie.

We are today living in the world of the victors of that war and without an objective, rational and balanced view of our history, we are doomed to repeat the mistakes. After World War Two, the victors of the war not only went on to write our history books, infiltrate our media and public education but even going so far as to criminalize the mere questioning of the official story’s orthodoxy. The truth is, that our world today can only be understood through a correct understanding of World War II, the architects of it and the conflicts between Globalism and Nationalism. Between the old-and-new world order. The Traditional and the “Progressive”.

Day in and day out, has the post-war propaganda been pounded into the minds of three subsequent generations. Every medium of mass indoctrination has been harnessed to the task of training the obedient masses as to what the proper and “acceptable” view of this event should be. Academia, news media, public education, book publishing, TV documentaries, Hollywood films and politicians of every stripe all sing the same song.

For very good reasons, most people don’t trust the mainstream media anymore. You have already heard the official history millions of times.

This documentary gives an overview of how Europe has been shaped in modern history. In it, you will find the secret history, where you will find the real causes of the events. Watch this series and uncover the real root causes of World War II. It will take you on an epic timeline that will transport you back in time and lead you on the journey through the Bolshevik Revolution, the communist attempts to take over Germany; hyperinflation during the Weimar Republic, widespread unemployment and misery, Adolf Hitler’s rise to power, World War I & II – all the way to the modern world. It presents the true historical events that lead to this world catastrophe known as the second world war, as well as the aftermath.

Do be forewarned though, your worldview might never be the same. As always, the Truth Fears No Investigation.

This documentary consists of 9 (10) parts, read all about it on

00:00:00 – Introduction
00:01:39 – Part 1
01:14:55 – Part 2
02:23:51 – Part 3
03:03:32 – Part 4
04:50:04 – Part 5
05:43:15 – Part 6
06:43:02 – Part 7
07:51:19 – Part 8
09:56:22 – Part 9
11:52:15 – Sources & Credits

The United Nations and the Modern Globalist Organizations

From my Instagram. I don’t use it much lately, my original Instagram earned over 2,000 subscribers with active engagement but I posted a Black Sun Wheel more than once and they banned me. Infact, this was the actual one that got me banned:

Notice how it has a bee in the middle. And it’s a honey comb backdrop. This concerned “bee power”…bees are our allies in the ecosystem…but our ecosystem, our way of living, our heritage, culture, values, traditions, norms, customs, rituals, reality – our very existence – is under attack on many fronts from the (((Globalist))) consortium outlined in the above Instagram post. The UN wants the world to adapt a one world culture. This involves eliminating race, color, religion, national identity, gender, YOU.