Stakeholder Globalism • American Mind

Source: https://americanmind.org/salvo/stakeholder-globalism/

Armed security personnel stand guard on the rooftop of a hotel, next to letters reading “Davos” surrounded by snow, near the Congress Centre on January 25, 2018 in Davos, eastern Switzerland. / AFP PHOTO / Fabrice COFFRINI (Photo credit should read FABRICE COFFRINI/AFP via Getty Images)

At the end of the twentieth century, the triumph of capitalist democracy convinced many that the field of human advancement had been cleared of adversaries. In the ensuing decades, Westerners were shocked to discover that field had filled with technological challengers.

As Cambridge historian David Runciman notes in How Democracy Ends, “the information technology revolution has completely altered the terms on which democracy must operate.” Capitalism is becoming less democratic and democracy less capitalist. Surveillance cameras are embedded in more places; cell phones track our movements; programs log our keystrokes.

The resulting information is fed into databases and assembled into profiles of unprecedented depth and fungibility. The decline in personal privacy might be worthwhile if it were matched by comparable levels of democratic choice and transparency. But for the most part, it is not. Unauthorized opinions are increasingly censored online, while giants like Amazon, Apple, and Google bar disfavored customers and businesses from their marketplaces.This shifting relationship between capitalism and democracy has not gone unnoticed by the West’s sharpest critics. At his first press conference in 20 years, Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid was asked about the Taliban’s commitment to freedom of speech. Journalists, Mujahid suggested, should ask the “promoters of freedom of speech” at Facebook why his government is banned from posting on Instagram and WhatsApp.The irony is rich.

In the heady millenarian days at the “end of history,” Silicon Valley imbued Big Tech with the wide-eyed spirit of the idealistic counterculture. Today, however, these former cultural nonconformists have become global gatekeepers. Twitter’s decision to suspend President Trump after the unrest at the Capitol opened the floodgates for tech companies and other services to ban political dissidents from their platforms.What is becoming clear is that there was a crucial flaw in the end-of-history vision.

What if the capitalists lose interest in democracy or find it inconvenient?

An intriguing concept almost unused in journalism but common in political discourse is a “globalist state” whose members have given up part of their sovereignty in return for a say in their neighbors’ affairs.Big Tech is at home in this globalized schema. Like most billionaires, Mark Zuckerberg regards the concept of nationalism with open hostility. The “struggle of our time,” Zuckerberg suggested, pits the “forces of freedom, openness and global community against the forces of authoritarianism, isolationism and nationalism. Forces for the flow of knowledge, trade and immigration against those who would slow them down.”Those who seek a grand conspiracy theory to explain this phenomenon will be disappointed. What we are dealing with here are often marginal reforms—a trickle rather than a flood. From western Europe to sub-Saharan Africa, policy-makers are moving many policy fields “upwards,” to the international or supranational arena, and “downwards” to NGOs and private companies.

This has been accompanied by a modest measure of structural change which has allowed powerful bureaucracies in the UN more control over national affairs.One influential advocate of this outlook is the former British prime minister Theresa May. Speaking to the House of Commons on the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, May described the events unfolding in the region as a “major setback” for UK foreign policy, adding: “We boast about Global Britain, but where is Global Britain on the streets of Kabul?” May found it “incomprehensible” and “worrying” that the UK was not able to bring together an alternative peacekeeping alliance.Globalism is best conceptualised less as a fantastic conspiracy so much as an emergent phenomenon among elites with overlapping interests, the goal of which is to deterritorialize politics. Members of the professional and managerial elite—journalists, economists, humanitarian aid workers, technologists—have adopted a very different attitude to borders than sectors of society who are bounded to their community’s territory.

As Zygmunt Bauman observed in the 2000s, territorial allegiances have become a class-specific property.Why history hasn’t endedIt would be difficult to exaggerate the significance of this change. For many hundreds of years, nationalism was the bedrock of international relations. Foreigners were routinely considered to be outsiders and could not be full members of the moral community.Over the past couple of decades, however, we have seen a dramatic reversal of this rule: pre-political ties are expanding to include larger groups, nations, families of nations, and perhaps even all humans. As a result, elite positions on global issues actually tend to be highly incoherent, and the need to consult “stakeholders” often leads to more liberal policy outcomes.A case in point here is the British government’s failure to stem the flow of illegal immigrants crossing the Channel in record numbers.

In 2019, the British Home Secretary, Priti Patel, campaigned on a platform of opposition to mass immigration, withdrawal from key human rights laws, and hostility to illegal entrants and bogus asylum seekers. Her views accurately reflected the opinions of the great majority of Conservative members, as well as great swathes of the electorate. They were not, however, acceptable within 10 Downing Street, so she failed to muster the support necessary to “take back control.”This state of affairs illuminates one of the central paradoxes of Western politics.

Although the technical capacity of states to control immigration has increased rather than diminished, and border control is widely held to be common sense by the majority of the population in every country, most Western governments are reluctant to implement effective enforcement of their own immigration laws. There is a gap between what politicians say and what politicians do, because immigration policy is considered above the pay grade of the masses. It is the domain of the globalist managers.

The withdrawal of the elites: Globalism belongs to a species of liberal thinking that deplores barriers to trade and disapproves strongly of borders. ‘’Openness,” “inclusion,” “diversity”: the globalist is, in his own eyes, a defender of enlightened universalism against the exigencies of geography. The key articulators of this movement now include not only Silicon Valley but also the military-intelligence complex, NGOs, and non-institutionalised protest groups whose global operations are facilitated by smartphones.Globalism has ushered in a period of massive wealth redistribution, from the lower middle class to the superrich, and from towns to cities. Today, a large firm in a modern city can source its capital in Shanghai, locate its industrial plant in Wolfsburg, and tap information from a database in Bangalore. Moreover, thanks to improvements in transport technology and infrastructure, businesses can hire large numbers of overseas graduates whose skills could not be realistically recruited from the domestic labor market. This explains why big business and its agents of opinion are without exception supporters of “Global Britain.”Meanwhile, at the lower end of the labor market, foreign workers are increasingly used to fill jobs that are considered too degrading for the native population to undertake.

Whether that is a good or a bad thing is a matter for some debate, but it is beyond question that the wealthy now prefer employing cheap labor from abroad. Today, as David Edgerton argues in The Rise and Fall of The British Nation, “a new anti-egalitarian snobbism is permissible, and a certain reactionary chic possible.”This is a formidable combination. And it is easy to see why elites don’t want to give up on it, at least not yet.

However, these policies must be debated with the utmost honesty if we are to do what is best for our country and for the planet. There is no denying that a gap has opened up between civilians, soldiers, governments, and corporations: the “we” feeling seems no longer to have a voice among our leaders.Contrary to what many have said, globalism does not rid the world of the nation state. It does, however, delimit it. Once in a position of power, globalists will hive off the functions of the state and farm them out to a complex range of extra-governmental organizations and semi-independent bodies. Their key function is to push “the rules of the game” beyond the reach of democratic politics, the strategy of deterritorialization. To a large extent, therefore, conflicts over territorial sovereignty have replaced many of the more familiar ideological battles of the twentieth century.

IS THIS IT?

Janet Yellen of the Federal Reserve Bank made an announcement that the United States government is in danger of defaulting on it’s loan obligations to the Federal Reserve Bank.

The debt ceiling must be raised by October if the United States is not to have it’s credit worthiness severely downgraded, US Treasuries to come crashing down, with it – the stock market (which has been pumped full of Federal Reserve $$$$$ freshly printed since at least February 2020), the real economy (what’s left of it) and sending the literal atomic blast-wave throughout the global financial system and all asset bubbles connected to the USD as the world’s reserve currency….this is the techno-judeo-pandemica-epstein-wipeout scenario the Davos minion have dreamed of…for the collapse of the USD formally gives way to the International Monetary Fund’s digital, sovereign, special drawing rights to officially pave the way for a one world digital currency.

IS THIS IT?

The ‘Great Reset’ for dummies…

This is a strikingly excellent analysis

The Wall Will Fall

This article was originally posted at https://tessa.substack.com

By Tessa Lena

What is “the Great Reset”?

The Great Reset is a massively funded, desperately ambitious, internationally coordinated project led by some of the biggest multinational corporations and financial players on the planet and carried out by cooperating state bodies and NGOs. Its soul is a combination of early 20th century science fiction, idyllic Soviet posters, the obsessiveness of a deranged accountant with a gambling addiction—and an upgraded, digital version of “Manifest Destiny.”

The mathematical reason for the Great Reset is that thanks to technology, the planet has gotten small, and the infinite expansion economic model is bust—but obviously, the super wealthy want to continue staying super wealthy, and so they need a miracle, another bubble, plus a surgically precise system for managing what they perceive as “their limited resources.” Thus, they desperately want a bubble providing new growth out…

View original post 6,590 more words

Symbols Conceal and Reveal

Above are the official symbols of:

  1. Early symbol of Christianity merged with the Roman Empire
  2. Israeli Mossad
  3. The United Soviet Socialist Republics emblem
  4. The current United Nations emblem

It’s quite interesting how similar these all are to one another as it’s also interesting how each of these “wreathed” emblems represent domination.

Constantine converted to Christianity – in essence merging the Roman Empire with the faith. The wreath represents what’s embodied within will not be broken.

The Mossad’s moto is “By Deception, thou shalt do war”, which explains a lot when dignitaries world wide become frustrated with Israel’s clandestine false flags, espionage and terrorist attacks self-defense operations.

The USSR was the pinnacle of what started with the Bolshevik Revolution which overthrew the Czar (monarchy) in Russia in 1917. The Bolsheviks were funded with Wall Street mega-bankers bankrolls. This is a good example of how capitalism and communism are reliant upon one another to exist. If anyone calls into question symbiosis between Capitalism and Communism – take a look at World War 2 – with the United States and the USSR entering into an alliance to defeat National Socialist Germany.

And finally we have the United Nations. The mechanism created by the Rothschild-led international central banking consortium to bring nations to the table in order to establish a one world system of governance, with people becoming a one world culture (globalism), under a uniform ideological framework called Communitarianism – which is explicitly a Capitalism/Communism hybrid.

And this hybrid is being brought about via the implementation of the UN Agenda 2030’s “Sustainable Development Goals (SDG)” . Stated very simply, the SDG targets are only attainable if the world as you know it was dramatically repurposed; societal, economic, political, financial, educational, medicinal and on and on.

But the East India Trading Company wants those SDG targets hit. And the dynasty that owns the East India Trading Company happens to own the controlling interest in the world’s central banking octopus, they own the City of London, they possess the deed to Palestine (Mossad was a response) …

Now, through the UN’s partnership with the World Economic Forum (WEF) that was launched in June 2019, the WEF became tasked with the responsibility of making the SDG package a reality.

The battle plan to achieve the implementation of Agenda 2030’s SDG is called THE GREAT RESET.

And the Great Reset was publicly launched on June 3rd, 2020 amidst the depths of the worldwide Coronavirus (panic, misguidance and worst of all – decimation of the middle class and the economy in it’s entirety). This is all being done to drive people into the arms of the concept of Communitarianism.

They’ll use the Fourth Industrial Revolution as the guise to the most massively sophisticated and powerful surveillance and security apparatus ever imagined; complete with big data feeding artificial intelligence, enhancing deep machine learning – complete with drones, robots, biometrics-capturing video and audio systems…the Bank of International Settlements will be tasked with the ultimate rollout of a uniform, global digital currency that will be tethered to all existing currencies in circulation as of now (ultimately to consolidate and phase then out).

Climate Change will be the big one to frighten the people – the Americans – into thinking the Earth will blow the Fuck up if they do not abolish whiteness, relinquish their private property, abandon religious, medicinal, scholastic, economic, recreational, social and most absolutely of all POLITICAL values and beliefs, accept the concept of global citizenship… the UN, for the past ten years or so, has been interchangeably using the terms “economic migrant” and “refugee” . And they have officially declared economic migration a human right – and have meme’d poorly developed parts of the world as casualties of climate change and global warming.

Thus, migration is needed to heal the Earth. And pronoun rehabilitation camps. And dildo sanitizer.

Except for Israel.

HOW FAKE AND GAY IT ALL HAS BEEN.