Sacred Destabilization • Part Four: Antinomianism and the Spiritual Roots of Critical Theory Philosophy

By: Eric • August 24, 2022


Drawing:, “Master’s Lodge as ruined Temple,” Les Francs-Maçons Ecrasés, 1747. [the ruined Temple is symbolic of the Second Temple of Solomon, which was destroyed]

Allow us to focus the lights of the arena on this concept for a moment. A certain cluster of churches rooted in Protestant sects of Christianity have carried out the agenda of Diversity, Inclusion and Equity™ by accepting and welcoming the LGBTQ people to the faith. This is de facto revoking the word of the Lord as stated in the bible. This is no longer a sin. If scripture is subject to revocation – than sin itself is subject to eradication.


Norm Macdonald Tweet from 2017(?) – predicting the Church of the Woke? He nailed it!

[Dear reader, uncited, quick summations of the following concepts, eras in time and historical events are given for the purpose of expediency, for they will be touched upon in more detail going forward. This is a 30 part series – the Sacred Destabilization]


Ordo ab Chao

Amongst many faiths, religions and mythologies, there is this ever present theme of “creation through destruction” – or within Freemasonry, the Latin “Ordo ab Chao”, which means “out of chaos, comes order.”

Yet, what, or who, creates the chaos and what defines chaos?

Take a look around. We are in the chaos. This is Building Seven, low-key, the world over. 



Antinomianism

From New World Encyclopedia: “Antinomianism or lawlessness in theology, is the idea that members of a particular religious group are under no obligation to obey the laws of ethics or morality as presented by religious authorities.”

The heart of antinomianism is belief in human perfection, the state of divine indwelling in which anything that one wills is good because it is prompted by the presence of God within.

As we discussed in Part Three, Sabbati Zevi introduced his brand of Kabbalah interpretation over the Jewish texts and determined that man must descend into sin – inverting the laws of Torah – to bring about the return of the Shattered God.


Sabbateanism

Rectifications or repairs or restorations to bring about the return of the Tetragrammaton are called Tikkun. These are acts performed that will reverberate throughout the universe to allow for the Shattered God to gather its sparks.

Now, the manner in which Zevi applied the metaphysical realm of Kabbalah, the fourth realm, he drew from the Torah and Talmud that God has been dispersed throughout the universe into sparks of light upon creation of man. It is said that God has to remove himself, from his space, in order for creation to have occurred. Upon this event, God became the Shattered God.

This is another duality: God removed himself – from himself – to create space for Man. It is seemingly a paradoxical duality.

According to Zevi, further bolstered by the influential Nathan of Gaza, for God to be restored whole, mankind had to descend into sin. If mankind took this path, the Shattered God will collect itself, collect these sparks, to return to whole, to redeem what he created. The Sabbatean way was redemption through sin.

Zevi said all that is bad is actually good. Manipulation, sexual perversion, adultery, stealing – sins necessary to restore God. Half of the known Jewish world was spellbound by this notion around 1666. This is very important.

When one contemplates the seemingly duplicitous nature of one’s “Greatest Ally ™” – one wonders – is there a spiritual element at play? A divine ordainment a certain identity admonishes upon themselves?

Zevi said: “Praised be He who permits the forbidden.”


Significance of the Location: Ottoman Empire

Sabbateanism arose throughout Eastern Europe, the Middle East, Northern Africa and even within many of the influential Jewish communities in Central and Western Europe. Even with the passing of Zevi, Sabbateanism had taken on its own form – a flavor of antinomianistic faith swept through all of society, even outside of Judaism.

Turkey (the country currently defined by its borders) was the home of Zevi. One of the important things about Zevi, in addition to resistance by some the high rabbis to this radical method of redemption through sin – ultimately the Sultan of the Ottoman Empire felt threatened, as Zevi made the proclamation that he wanted to become King. Zevi was imprisoned, long and short of this – he remained so inspirational whilst imprisoned that he was given a choice to live, he had to convert to Islam.

Other Jews following Zevi converted as well. For optics, appearances.

Thereafter these new Muslims were known as Dönme.

By the 1680s, the Dönme had congregated in Salonica, the cosmopolitan and majority-Jewish city in the Ottoman Empire. For the next 250 years, they would lead an independent communal life—intermarrying, doing business together, maintaining their own shrines, and handing down their secret traditions.



In Part Five, we will venture into the “Second False Messiah”, the Occult, Revolution, birth of Left/Right alignments, Marxism, the Bolsheviks, the capitalists behind the revolutionaries, psychoanalysis (and its affect on ideology), Weimar Republic, Frankfurt School and analysis of Critical Theory origins.

Collapse is Going to Happen, Like It or Not

The Neo-Ciceronian Times

Regular readers know by now that I am a big fan of the demographic-structural theory (DST) proposed by cliodynamicist historians such as Jack Goldstone and Peter Turchin. The reason I find it so interesting is because of how intellectually satisfying it is. Most theories of history are linear and progressive, and their proponents often struggle to force a progressive narrative onto otherwise cyclical and chaotic series of historical events. Demographic-structural theory, through its explicitly cyclical approach to understanding the rise and fall of empires, not only makes more sense intellectually, but also has the added advantage of having a great deal of explanatory power. The theory closely fits what we actually observe from the empirical evidences we have available and can then be successfully applied to analyses of the histories of other polities as well.

In addition to explanatory power, DST also has predictive power as well. While DST…

View original post 2,305 more words

The Interplay of Ideology, Biology, Guilt and Shame • Age of Treason (January 19, 2014)

Source: TANSTAAFL

In whatever happened to european tribes? hbd* chick posits that Christianity discouraged inbreeding, which in turn triggered the dissolution of European tribalism and consequent shift in emphasis to the nuclear family.

We can see in this the give and take between ideology and biology – the roots of identity are genetic, but memes, over generations, do shape the underlying gene pool. To the extent outbreeding produces a relative shift in identity rather than simply destroying it, this also provides a partial, biological explanation for why Whites tend toward both broader (nationalist, racialist) and narrower (individualist) forms of identity. An even more proximate and substantial cause lies in decades of anti-White propaganda, and it encourages more extreme shifts, whether outward into humanism or inward into solipsism.

hbd* chick has been writing thought-provoking articles about the nature and origins of Europeans for some time. This article on European tribalism is from 2011, part of her inbreeding in europe series. More recently she has written about what she calls the outbreeding project, a subset of her general theory of the west – all based on the realization that clannishness goes hand in hand with consanguinity.

Two of her more recent posts, more on the origins of guilt in northwestern european populations and the transition from shame to guilt in anglo-saxon england (and “core” europe), are a critique of Peter Frost’s The origins of Northwest European guilt culture and Part II.

Frost begins Part I by noting the crucial difference between shame and guilt:

Shame is the primary means of behavioral control in most societies. If you are seen breaking a social rule, you will feel shame, and this feeling will be reinforced by what people say and do (gossiping, malicious looks, spitting, ostracism, etc.). Shame is much less effective if you break a rule without being seen or if you merely think about breaking a rule.

Guilt is more important in European societies, particularly those of Northwest European origin. It operates even when you act alone or merely think about breaking a rule. Behavior can thus be regulated in all possible situations with a minimum of surveillance.

Put more plainly, shame is the means by which more particularist/collectivist non-Whites maintain group cohesion, whereas guilt is the means by which more universalist/individualist Whites are encouraged to selflessly maintain a civil society in which everyone but Whites can thrive. Shame is something groups inflict upon themselves, for their own benefit, whereas guilt-tripping is a weapon of group warfare, used by non-Whites to discourage White group cohesion in any form between family and race.

Ironically, Frost cites Ruth Benedict on how shame compares to guilt:

Ruth Benedict first made the distinction between “shame cultures” and “guilt cultures”. Pervasive feelings of guilt are part of a behavioral package that enabled Northwest Europeans to adapt to complex social environments where kinship is less important and where rules of correct behavior must be obeyed with a minimum of surveillance.

Benedict helped establish cultural anthropology, which has since largely displaced physical anthropology, substituting jewish pilpul and narrative for the objective science developed by Northwest Europeans. If nothing else Benedict’s cultural theorizing helps explain her own mindset, moved by her “guilt culture” to work with members of a “shame culture” – jews like her mentor Franz Boas, her colleague Gene Weltfish and a swarm of other social science activists who were more or less openly obsessed with advancing the interests of their own tribe.

In order to prevail these cultural anthropologists literally made up stories and falsified data. They shamelessly leveraged tribalist networking, using their power and authority to advance pseudo-science while denouncing, shunning, defunding and otherwise tearing down their opponents. What’s more, they never expressed the slightest twinge of shame or guilt about it. They were far too busy feeling morally righteous about themselves and their cause.

The “behavioral package” of jews is adapted to parasitism. They do not empathize with their hosts. They will use shame, guilt, or any other mechanism they can in order to marginalize their enemies and hijack or hoodwink others into serving their interests. In contrast to Whites, who actually do feel guilt and shame each other mercilessly over “racism”, jews feel guilt and shame each other for not being obsessed enough about what’s best for the jews.

Frost argues that Northwestern European “guilt culture” predates Christianity. hbd* chick argues the origins are more recent, a consequence of the avoidance of cousin marriage. I’m intrigued by the subject and recognize some truth in both arguments. What leaves me vaguely annoyed is the calm Northwestern European detachment with which they discuss the subject. The “guilt culture” is only one facet of White pathology, the more general attribute of which is the absurd pretense that everybody is, or with enough effort on our part can become, “us”. The affliction isn’t unique to either Northwestern Europeans or Christians. It also, frankly, doesn’t seem to be either shame or guilt which keeps Whites who are so intelligent and knowledgeable about history and science and conscious of Northwestern European distinctiveness from taking more notice of the jew elephant in the room.

The more I think about it, the more I think that the main mechanism lies even deeper in the psyche, below guilt and shame. In pain. In the fear of pain. In the fear of even mentioning those things we suspect might cause us pain. Here too I can see the interplay of evil thoughts and breeding. The dysgenic consequence of two centuries of fratricidal revolution and war selecting out Europe’s most fearless and noble. The sterile fruit of parasite-fomented, parasite-serving materialism and “enlightenment”.

Tanstaafl at 1/19/2014 11:58:00 PM

Waco – A New Revelation – Neo-Liberal State War Machine’s Assault on Christianity and Constitutional Freedoms

The portrayal of the Branch Dividians and David Koresh by the establishment media cast them as the belligerents in the Waco standoff. Hundreds of thousands if not millions of newscasts always paint a picture of David Koresh forcing his religious group into suicide. By inferno.

The reality is that the government, via the ATF, chose to make a harsh example of what happens when a group of people with an in-group religious preference acquire firearms that are outside the scope of approval by the coming of the Globohomogayplex, Neo-Liberal, State/Media apparatus.

What’s striking here is:

  • The true origins of the inferno (Delta)
  • The conflict of interest in negotiations (FBI)
  • Fucking CHUCK SCHUMER (this man has got to GO…it’s like 100 years later and he’s still in office)