Great discussion with Jazzhands, Warren and Tim on #theNoticing, the Twitter/Elon Musk/ADL/judeo-censorship, Kyrie, Ye, BDS, semitism and more.
Two of the legendary dissident political podcasts united on one episode…
Great discussion with Jazzhands, Warren and Tim on #theNoticing, the Twitter/Elon Musk/ADL/judeo-censorship, Kyrie, Ye, BDS, semitism and more.
Two of the legendary dissident political podcasts united on one episode…
By: Eric • September 5, 2022
We know the deal with Twitter. CIA-sponsored clandestine overthrow of Bolivian government which lands Elon Musk’s Tesla exclusive rights to extract Lithium in the name of “democracy rules based international liberal world order” – that whole amalgamation was set to buy Twitter then questionably pulled out of the deal and the lawsuit is set to proceed in October, which lines up nicely to further distract the vaxxed-masses from the fake and very gay midterm selections (which will be touted as stolen/fake/democracy prevails/etc etc, no matter which uni-party candidates win). ** §
Yes, the Johnny Depp-Amber Heard trial provided interference from Russia maneuvering victoriously with their Special Military Operation to recapture Russian land from Khazaria.
The January 6 Save Democracy ™ trials – primetime coverage – to link Trump’s ketchup squirting, steering wheel grabbing to Nazi-Christo-Fascist-White-MAGA-Qanon-Terrorists (which I call taxpaying, God-fearing, working people who believe in the Constitutional Republic) – this ran perfect interference from the inflation, surging fuel prices, recession, clot-shot deathVax VAERS events, exploding capital crimes, omissions of second & part-time jobs from actual employment numbers (also the proportion of newly created federal and state level government jobs in those numbers), etc etc. We all know the deal. This is the New Normal. Make no mistake, the Musk/Twitter lawsuits/counter-lawsuits will dominate the airwaves through the fall – conveniently redirecting focus from the Vote.
That’s not the point. This is an ADHD-infused blog post I am way off the subject though I am glad you have come this far.
Twitter’s new features, very suspicious:
On its face I applaud Twitter for making this option to add a written description, for context, to an image that accompanies a tweet. It is a solid idea and it is courteous to those that are visually impaired.
And that reason – wholesome on the surface – is exactly why I know it is a cover for the real intended purpose:
Twitter, like Faceberg, TikTok, Snapchat, etc – is valuable for it is a cream-of-the-crop Big Data Farm – capturing the semantic properties of millions of users, in real-time, every moment. This data feeds the deep machine learning which determines the voracity of Artificial Intelligence. That’s it. By having the users add the description to the image, it gives greater depth and breadth to the context of the tweet – this is a stratospherically valuable feature as an input to the data sets that feed the big vacuum in the sky.
Here is an example:
There we have it. Twitter – part of the GIFCT/GNET/ADL/RUSI/War College of London/Five Eyes/DHS “Content Hash Database” consortium is doing this for the data and to also boost the relevance and viability of those newly hired government spooks disregarded in the employment numbers. They are watching the wrong-thinkers so they can dispatch the glow-troons to arrest the unvaxxed for tweets that are a threat to the rules based democracy American Dream (financed at 33% APR).
** – not to worry, whomever is “elected” will continue to fail and disappoint all of those that believe if their votes counted towards creating policy to benefit ordinary people – that one would be allowed to vote? Hahaha yeah, sure.
§ – don’t worry about $$$$ to Israel, $$$$ for the democracy Ukraine winning war, $$$$ for the military industrial complex, nor $$$$ for Patriot Act apparatus expansion – those are guaranteed forever.
From “S. Silver”
Women have a unique strength: our ability to give birth. This strength cannot be justly undermined, underestimated, or demeaned, for without it none of us would be alive today, our way of life and our culture would vanish, our very species would cease to exist. While it is sadly popular nowadays to think that the world would be better off without humans, or that Albertan children are unnecessary as we can import foreigners to replace ourselves, this is a sickly mentality that amounts to a drive for cultural suicide. The first rule of health for any biological population is their ability to reproduce and pass along their way of life into the future. Women are not exactly equal to men. This biological reality is also under attack by present-day delusion. To try to promote that women break into careers that men traditionally dominate is not only misguided, but it is harmful. Such a focus detracts from the languishing unique strength and the truly important role that women have in the preservation of our community, culture, and species. Unfortunately, present day government policies all-too-often have this misguided and harmful aim. Many women now realize in their late 30s that they actually want a child after having been taught that career was what mattered earlier in their lives, and they then regret not having done it earlier, when they were in their prime. Others couldn’t afford to have children when they were younger. Sadly, having children is an expensive burden in our modern society. It is this way because our society has become oriented around personal greed and selfish and hedonistic goals. Families who are trying to raise children are competing for resources such as housing, and are at a disadvantage in this environment. And while there is some government assistance for people with children, it is primarily focused on the lowest income parents, so it provides little help to middle class families. My vision of Alberta is a place that is oriented around healthy families and communities again, not around personal greed and selfishness. Recognizing children as being of the utmost importance in our society would be the cornerstone of such a future. Unity among people requires shared common values, and the importance of children and family are the most fundamental values of any healthy population, so this is also the place to start towards achieving greater unity among presently-divided Albertans. As a future parliamentarian, I would promote healthy appreciation for the value that young Albertan women have in their ability to carry our population forward into the future. I believe that the best approach would be to reward families for their reproductive service both with financial rewards to offset the financial burden they are taking on and with medals to symbolize their valuable achievement of having 2+ children. Encouraging our society to reorient in this healthier perspective would provide the greatest good for Alberta going forward and would alleviate many of the problems that we are currently facing.
Last month, left-wing news and opinion outlets published headlines blaring that Senator Ted Cruz had defended the use of the Nazi salute. This claim was then predictably amplified throughout the Twitterverse. The headlines, however, and the simple-minded and indignant Tweets that followed, were misinformation designed to discredit Cruz, long an object of the Left’s hatred.
Cruz’s remarks took place in a hearing of the Senate Judiciary Committee at which Attorney General Merrick Garland was testifying. Cruz, in the first place, was not even talking about the use of the Nazi salute to signal allegiance to Nazism. He was instead talking about its use by people who wished to protest—by mocking and insulting—the actions of public officials.
More to the point, however, Cruz was not “defending” the use of the Nazi salute at all. He merely pointed out that its use is, under the prevailing interpretation of the First Amendment, a form of constitutionally protected expression, and that it therefore cannot properly be treated as a reason for a federal investigation. This is not a controversial opinion and would not seem to merit denunciation. Indeed, in his own testimony, Garland immediately agreed with Cruz that the salute is protected by the First Amendment.
There is a serious problem here, beyond the by now very tiresome and predictable dishonesty of much of the American news media. If defenses of First Amendment protections of offensive expression are going to be popularly equated with defenses of the offensive expression itself, then it will, sooner or later, become disreputable to defend constitutional norms of free expression. And as a further result those norms will decay and finally vanish. Constitutional norms cannot live without actual human beings who are willing to uphold them, and such willingness will evaporate if upholding them makes you the object of mass media denunciation.
American liberals used to understand this quite well. The classical, if not cliched, attitude of a liberal has always been to proclaim, “I disagree with what you are saying, but I would defend to the death your right to say it!” Some liberals today might still say that, but few contemporary leftists would.
A second and even clearer example of authoritarian tendencies on the Left also showed up recently. This time the provocation was a television documentary—specifically, Tucker Carlson’s show on the events of last January 6. Having seen only the trailer, some public voices claimed that Carlson’s documentary should not see the light of day.
Lindsey Simmons—a Missouri Democrat, aspiring Congresswoman, and (in her Twitter bio) self-proclaimed “cultivator of Democracy”—responded to Carlson’s promotion of his documentary as follows: “The freedom of speech is not absolute. It can be restricted where it incites imminent lawless action. Tucker Carlson and Fox News are creating propaganda to incite a Civil War. At some point we must use the legal tools available to us before it is too late.”
Simmons is a product of Harvard Law School, and so she knows how to invoke the language of the Supreme Court’s First Amendment doctrines, like “incit[ing] imminent lawless action.” But she either does not understand or is deliberately distorting the First Amendment standards to which she refers. To do what she is suggesting—to prevent or punish the airing of Tucker Carlson’s documentary—would not be using the legal tools available to us. It would be replacing those tools with new tools that are not consistent with the First Amendment standards that have existed for more than fifty years.
The “imminent lawless action” standard was articulated by the Supreme Court in 1969 in Brandenburg v. Ohio. There the Court (unanimously!) voided the conviction of a leader of the Ku Klux Klan who had, in the course of a speech at a Klan rally, made some threatening remarks and who had then been prosecuted under Ohio’s criminal syndicalism statute. That statute made it a crime to advocate the use of “crime, sabotage, violence or unlawful methods of terrorism as a means of accomplishing industrial or political reform.”
It was not clear that Brandenburg had advocated violence in the words he used. He had remarked rather vaguely and inarticulately that “some revengance” might have to be taken on America’s political institutions. In any case, the Court held that even if Brandenburg had clearly advocated violence, he could not be convicted, because he was not advocating immediate action that was likely to take place. According to the Court, modern First Amendment doctrine establishes “the principle that the constitutional guarantees of free speech and free press do not permit a State to forbid or proscribe advocacy of the use of force or of law violation except where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action.”
Carlson’s documentary offers an alternative account of the events of January 6 than the one has prevailed thus far—and his account is not flattering to the government of the United States. For the sake of argument, give Carlson’s critics every benefit of the doubt and suppose his documentary is wholly a pack of lies. It still could not be touched under the “imminent lawless action” test. For him to be subject to legal punishment, he would have to have advocated illegal actions that are likely about to happen. Did anybody seriously expect that? Did Lindsey Simmons think a civil war might break out because of a TV show?
Does Lindsey Simmons not see that her principles, if adopted, would permit conservative state governments to suppress the speech of left-wing critics of American society? It is common for such critics to say that our “system” must be “torn down,” or to claim that America is guilty of “genocide” or equally egregious crimes. Wouldn’t these be incitements to revolution or civil war? These are the kinds of consequences that ought to be pondered by those who wish to use the power of government to silence those with whom they disagree.
The dangers here are not immediate but are nevertheless real. Ted Cruz is a big boy. He’s a famous person and a United States senator. He won’t be materially harmed by his enemies’ smears. Similarly, there is no danger that Tucker Carlson will be prosecuted for airing a documentary. Most American judges have more respect for existing First Amendment standards than celebrity lawyer/politicians sounding off on Twitter. But our task should be to preserve freedom of speech and debate for the next generation and the generation after that, and that task requires that the left’s authoritarian tendencies be confronted and repudiated now.
This blog is excellent, excellent insight on the globalist machine.
NATO is inflamed over the amount of ‘disinformation’ that is plaguing social media platforms. According to their own self image, NATO states: “NATO member countries maintain open civil communications systems, some with very high rates of social media and social messaging use.” Simultaneously, NATO states that false messages and inflammatory statements are a direct danger in “the damage they can do to citizens’ faith in the institutions of democratic governance and resources of public information and discussion.” Therefore, ‘open communication’ must be censored.
These ‘warfare campaigns’ must be silenced in order to have a free open source of information. Please read that again… ‘silencing in order to be free and open source’. Claiming disinformation is warfare sets the stage for the institution of Nazi style laws that prohibit anyone from saying anything deemed disinformation.
Given that humans are currently responsible for tattling on other humans, NATO wants AI to take control.
Currently, certain words or phrases are delisted and are the source of censorship. But together with Johns Hopkins, NATO wants emotions to be targeted. They term this new design as ‘Sentiment Analysis’. If AI determines a particular sentiment is not within the programmed guidelines, a circuit breaker effect would be instituted globally.
Within this algorithm of AI regulatory analysis, censors will not only delete the communication pathway, but could also insert legal action resulting in censor police knocking down doors. All of this is based on The Great RESET of global governance.
Member states of NATO would be required to adopt these censorship mechanisms or face de-alliance.
DISINFORMATION Definition: false information which is intended to mislead, especially propaganda issued by a government organization to a rival power or the media.
In other words, disinformation is born of government propaganda according to dictionary.com. That would indicate that the government is using the media to convey the notion that disinformation is parlayed via individuals on social media – which IS the disinformation! Funny word-play!
Johns Hopkins is a partner of NATO. They have other interesting partnership alliances, including with; Tsinghua University in China, China University in Hong Kong, Shanghai Jia Tong University – China, and Nanjing University – China. They have been heavily involved in the Thousand Talent Program in China and have yet to decouple that arrangement despite concerns over the sharing of US intellectual property.
While our media, NATO and White House Handlers would have us believe China is our enemy… Johns Hopkins does not. ODD!
Johns Hopkins is also the designated source of statistics for CoVid cases and deaths via their algorithm. They are a perpetuator of Climate Change Theory including climate change’s racism. An event with two speakers , one from Bloomberg’s Johns Hopkins is scheduled at Harvard the latter part of this month to discuss Climate’s racism.
Given climate is racist, trees are racist, birds are racist, street signs are racist, sidewalks are racist, crayons are racist… the Cloud should be deemed racist given it represents fluffy whiteness. Right?
In 2020, Johns Hopkins contributed $2.4 million to Democrats and $92,000 to Republicans. But they are nonpartisan. Its most recent grant from NIH announced October 2021 is in the amount of $4 million. The purpose of the grant is to study and research the use of psilocybin mushrooms to explore the impact on tobacco addiction. So you might cure that smoking addiction but you’ll be crazy and confined in a mental institution, so who cares…
A total of 85% of Johns Hopkins funding is via federal and state governments – $2.562 million. That means ALL taxpayers are paying for Johns Hopkins to give the money to Democrat PACs… Sounds logical.
Johns Hopkins provides internships for students with: GAVI, UNICEF, WHO and Pan American Health Organization, although a WHO internship was cancelled this year because of CoVid. ???
At the recent NATO Summit, US Defense blunderer, Lloyd Austin, made the following playbook statement with regard to China: “We see an increasing interest in our allies and partners [in the Indo-Pacific] to ensure the region remains free and open, and the rules-based international order remains in place.”
However Jens Stoltenberg was quick to add that Russia continues to take a close second place as the target of demonizing after NATO expelled 8 Russian ‘spies’, errr diplomats. The evidence? NATO declared their decision was based on intelligence and they are not going to comment on their intelligence… Ah
NATO has gone Full ballistic mental in abiding by the Handlers that make the rules. What becomes increasingly clear is that the pedophilia based NATO is being situated to be the global police, not just of coups but of censorship as in Big Brother. Not one UN Peacekeeper or NATO personnel accused of sexual assault was jailed despite more than 2,000 allegations. Just one allegation was from a 12 year old who claimed she was paid 75 cents for each of the 40 men she was prostituted to.
It would be interesting if Persia takes a stab at the Great Gay Klaus Schwab. However, since Rouhani and Zariff both were at Davos ….that’s unlikely. Kabbalah calculus here we go …
Jigsaw is the project run under the Alphabet (Google) corporation’s sphere of “innovative and groundbreaking” progress in technologies coming out of silicon valley as of late.
Make no mistake:
Google, Amazon, Apple, Faceberg and Microsoft are oligarchical behemouths that gobble up disruptive/groundbreaking/truly innovative new technologies – they do so by engaging teams of shrewd law firms, private equity outfits, vulture capital operations and in many cases the Boustrophedon-binary option derivatives of the Shaddai-ways aka BlackRock/Goldman Sachs/JP Morgan – be sure these juggernauts stifle any/all progress in technology available to the general public.
The aforementioned companies are the most valuable publicly traded companies on the planet and it is because they possess the precious resource – the DATA. Data and it’s scope of capabilities infact was the disruptive element of bigtech. It’s not the cookies in your browser nor the ads for fishing gear that pop up after you just emailed your boss about a fishing trip. That’s 2010 shit. The reams of data and the capabilities of augmenting the data to suit a purpose are beyond words descriptive abilities -:hence this is why the companies mentioned are amongst the ten most valuable in the entire world.
By the very definition of the word Oligarchy…
We are living under one. That’s a tightly woven web of technology/medicine/government/energy/media/military/entertainment and of course this is all at the mercy of the finance realm.
The greatest threat to this axis of pronouns are capable, competent peoples…which is why the Russians, Chinese, Shia Muslims, Persians and the domestic gamergaters have been relegated as the enemy of the coming Communitarianism-infused one world order.
That’s why Google – the company that has compiled enough data via mobile device use through retina scans, finger prints, gyroscopes, accelerometers, compasses, audio recorders, meta data quadrillions of miles deep, real time analysis performed by the AI of the semantic properties of the users of it’s products has created a new precious resource. It’s not just “Big Data”. It’s analytics performed in real time over infinite crashing tides of real time data that allows machines to make informed decisions within a given context. This is beyond “Big Data/Machine Learning/Artificial Intelligence”….this is the race to Artificial Consciousness…not just compute things…but make decisions ie yes/no, right/wrong, shoot/spare, etc. It’s coming.
In the meantime as La Kosher Nostra dangles like a little piece of a piece of a thing that gets the SJW/BLM/fembots/beta-male, cucked, queer, genderfluid jihadists and of course the virtual signalling cabal of middle management of the Fortune 500 and reverberate throughout their suburbs.
Google presents Jigsaw!
It is bullocks and wank. And fake and gay. And run by bugmen and dykes with neo-penii.
First allow me to share with you from Jigsaw’s website exactly what this project (which might not cure cancer nor malaria, but it is sure to assist in the Genderfluid-jihad).
Jigsaw targets four areas (that we are aware of)
Jigsaw is in deep with the consortium of the global projects underway right now that are successfully meme’ing together the following into a single demographic:
I’m exploring the Toxicity feature. Jigsaw, mind you, is being utilized by the DHS, FBI, GNET, GIFCT, RUSI, ICSR, Tech Against Terrorism, the UN-CTED, Moonshot, Tumblr, YouTube, Microsoft, MEGA, Mail Chimp, Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, Imgur – it is being used by the CENSOR-JUSTICE-WARRIORS.
My experiment is within the “Toxicity” feature. The following is directly from the Jigsaw website: Link: Jigsaw Toxicity
From Jigsaw website:
Protecting voices in conversation:
Online abuse and toxicity stops people from engaging in conversation and, in extreme cases, forces people offline. We’re finding new ways to reduce toxicity, and ensure everyone can safely participate in online conversations.
PRODUCT AND EXPERIMENTS
Perspective API uses machine learning to identify toxic language, making it easier to host better conversations online. Perspective is used to give feedback to commenters, help moderators more easily review comments, and keep conversations open online.
A Chrome extension that helps people adjust the level of toxicity they see in comments across the internet.
My experimentation: I have decided to use the Perspective API which allows you to enter in any choice words and then determines how toxic the words are classified as. Check out some of the fun:
“THE ULTIMATE GOAL OF THE STATE IS TO CULTIVATE ABSOLUTE DEPENDENCY ON IT BY ITS SUBJECTS. THIS IS BECAUSE UNTIL THIS HAPPENS THERE IS A REAL DANGER THAT THOSE GOVERNED WILL ONE DAY WAKE UP AND REALIZE THAT THE STATE IS NOT ONLY ENTIRELY UNNECESSARY BUT ACTUALLY MALIGNANT; A MALEVOLENT FORCE ACTIVELY IMPOVERISHING SOCIETY TO THE BENEFIT OF IT’S ELITES”
The Pentagon under Biden-appointed Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin is working to partner with the Southern Poverty Law Center and the Anti-Defamation League and spy on membe.
I’ve already stated my view of Big Tech. Destroying Big Tech is now our top priority. The Hill: “Americans’ perceptions of big tech companies have steadily deteriorated over the past 18 months as titans like Facebook, Twitter and Amazon receive an avalanche of bipartisan criticism, according to a new poll.A new Gallup poll released Thursday shows that…Poll: Big Tech’s Public Image Has Severely Deteriorated — Occidental Dissent
Brendon O’Connell has his finger on the pulse of the connections between Zionism, the Greater Israel Project, U.S. political theatre, the UN’s Agenda 2030, the Great Reset, Big Data/Artificial Intelligence/Deep Machine Learning and it’s looming surveillance capabilities, censorship and more. He has a YouTube channel still and his Bitchute is straight FIRE Links to his stuff are beneath the two embeds below.
Document on Industrial Zionism:
Brendon O’Connell Links:
Youtube: Brendon O’Connell
Brighteon: Brendon O’Connell